The 1st DD had 5 exhibitors I think. In April 12, there were probably in excess of 50. At the same time the format for speakers early on at DD was "NO" shameless endorsement of your company, even though you had to pay to speak. That has gone largely unchecked in recent years as both attendees and speakers will attest too. That has diluted the quality of the message, and the influence on the attendee. So what do they do, they look elsewhere for quality information delivered in a non biased way, and there seems to be multiple choices. All of the sudden we have 10 conferences, no clear winner, and a bunch of sheep who don't know where to go, or what to do with all the choices created by competition. Digital Wolfington, (did I say that) should show some marketplace dominance and crush the competition, or some of the smaller players should come together to take out the competition. Users should be vocal in their need for 1, or MAYBE 2 conferences per year. How many of you attendees, can afford 3 or 4, 3 day trips outside of the store per year? How many exhibitors can pay the crazy fees to exhibit and call it "worth it" at the end of the year. As an attendee, you have to ask "did I collect actionable information that lead to more sales?", and as an exhibitor you have to ask "did I see enough opportunities to offset some of my costs?"
I'm interested in DR feedback
I'm interested in DR feedback