• Stop being a LURKER - join our dealer community and get involved. Sign up and start a conversation.

Ask Tom Kline a scary question about a dealership or vendor practice

Alex Snyder

President Skroob
Staff member
May 1, 2006
3,615
2,549
Awards
13
First Name
Alex
On the heels of last Friday's RefreshFriday with Tom Kline, we wanted to bring his expertise into the community further. In Reddit "ask me anything" style, Tom has agreed to respond to your questions in this thread.

Some things you could be asking:
  • How might a "fully compliant" dealership still be practicing payment packing (product stuffing) today?
  • How is digital retailing opening dealers up to potential lawsuits?
  • Is there anything on my website I should be concerned about?
 
Tom - What is a common lawsuit (similar in nature and happened to several dealers) that has caught those dealers / groups by surprise?

Also, do you see a common issue that dealers correct before a potential lawsuit even happens?

Shawn,

In the last 60 days, there has been an uptick in enforcement activity:

#1

Carvana lost the ability to transaction business in Illinois according to Automotive News (May 16, 2022) because, “The Secretary of State's police department opened an investigation into consumer complaints about Carvana in February, (Henry) Haupt told Automotive News. The investigation spans about 90 signed complaints, Haupt said. He said he couldn't provide an exact date as to when Carvana might see the suspension lifted.” Since this initial release, Carvana has regained their ability to process title on a probationary basis.

#2

According to a press release from the Texas Attorney General’s Office:

“Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a deceptive trade practices lawsuit against the online used vehicle dealer Vroom Automotive LLC and Vroom Inc., which also sells cars to Texas consumers under the name Texas Direct Auto. The lawsuit alleges that Vroom has misrepresented and failed to disclose significant delays in transferring clear title and obtaining vehicle registrations, burdening thousands of consumers. The State also alleges that Vroom has misrepresented and failed to disclose vehicle history and condition and terms of financing and approval—all violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act. According to the lawsuit, Vroom has not managed its growth effectively, leading to inadequate systems and procedures that have harmed Texas consumers.

Over the last three years, consumers have filed over 5,000 complaints with both the Better Business Bureau and the Office of the Attorney General against Vroom and Texas Direct Auto.”

#3

According to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Press Release dated April 1, 2022:

“The Federal Trade Commission and the State of Illinois are taking action against Napleton, a large, multistate auto dealer group based in Illinois, for sneaking illegal junk fees for unwanted “add-ons” onto customers’ bills and for discriminating against Black consumers by charging them more for financing. Napleton will pay $10 million to settle the lawsuit brought by the FTC and the State of Illinois, a record-setting monetary judgment for an FTC auto lending case…

A survey cited in the complaint showed that 83 percent of buyers from the dealerships were charged junk fees for add-ons without authorization or as a result of deception. One consumer cited in the complaint reported that the dealership located in Arlington Heights, Ill., charged him for nearly $4,000 in add-on fees after he’d paid a similar amount in down payment.”

So, from the outside looking in, it appears these three (3) organizations do not have procedures in place to handle their customer queries, issues, and problems. So, by default, by attrition, or by apathy, they are ceding control and allowing the regulators to fine them and suspend them, thereby driving the dealerships to manage their own business affairs. (Good pun, right?)

In the Napleton matter, a staggering 83 percent of buyers said Napleton took advantage of them. Let’s examine that statistic even further.

In order to gather the information about the 83 percent, Napleton had to allow the FTC to have access to its customer files. The FTC must have had quite a lot of leverage for Napleton to agree to give them that access. Further, 83 percent cannot be simply “miscommunications” or “misunderstandings.” It’s an astonishing number which cannot be explained away.

So, Shawn, fix your customer problems and issues. You should scour the internet for complaints and bring the customers back to the dealership and fix the issues. (It doesn't matter who is "right." The issues need to be fixed.)

Secondly, make sure your employees are happy. Most dealership problems start with customers or employees.

Finally, outside of the two-legged problems of customers or employees, regulators and attorneys get upset over advertising violations on your website and in your other ads. "Bait and switch" advertising issues cause problems. Have someone take a look at your website to ensure you are not inadvertently making mistakes which might upset customers.

Hope that answers your question?

Cheers,

Tom
 
You mentioned some really common website issues last week. Would you share those again here? Things like disclaimer placement on SRPs, stolen/recovered/repaired disclosures, etc. (Yes, someone paid attention in class!) I also liked the tip about having customers sign the Carfax as an additional disclosure for the customer and protection for the dealership. Other sales/delivery process callouts?
 
You mentioned some really common website issues last week. Would you share those again here? Things like disclaimer placement on SRPs, stolen/recovered/repaired disclosures, etc. (Yes, someone paid attention in class!) I also liked the tip about having customers sign the Carfax as an additional disclosure for the customer and protection for the dealership. Other sales/delivery process callouts?

Be happy to.

Ensure the sales price on your website has an asterisks (or other symbol) to tie your disclaimer to the actual sales price of the vehicle. Otherwise, it is assumed that the sales tax, tags, processing fee etc. are included in the sales price. This issue can create class action exposure for the dealership as well as claims for Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts and Practices (UDAAP).

If you state allows a processing fee, make sure the exact amount of the fee is in the disclosure.

Ensure whatever the state law allows, whether it's a "processing fee" or "doc fee," that you use the exact language in your disclaimer.

To be safe, based on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) publications and the guidance, the exact amount of the fee should be disclosed:
  • The actual amount of the “emissions fee”
  • The actual amount of the “electronic filing charge” etc.
You cannot advertise a price and then "disclaim" something else to change the price.

The disclaimer has to be "clear and conspicuous."

All legacy language should be removed if it is not pertinent anymore.

I have about 4-5 pages of other sales practices which are important. I'll list a few here:

Your billing department should reject any deals, and not bill them, if you do not have a Buyer's Order which matches the Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC) and the menu.

Send out adverse action letters to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Do an OFAC audit (and training) to make sure everyone know this procedure and is tracking and documenting any activity.

After re-contracts, make sure you have an additional set of documents which match (as stated above).

Do you sell 15 passenger vans? Make sure you have the customer sign a school bus disclosure which says that the customer understands that the van is not certified as a school bus by NHTSA.

Cheers.