I'm not 100% on this pre-conclusion.
Most recognizable body at the left, to the least recognizable to the right.
I'm being nitpicky here, but there's some conclusion bias here.
Example:
Volvo launches the totally redesigned XC60 and spends essentially no money marketing it.
Customers never see it in commercials and if they do, the commercial only shows the side profile for 2 seconds.
Volvo has less than 1% market share and lower production than almost every other car.
With that in mind, we can't possibly conclude that people didn't recognize the Volvo XC60 due to it's lack of defining body profile lines.
Volvo has the most distinct tail lights in the industry IMHO. I think if you had a drop down of all the SUVs in the test people would have known the Volvo.
Other than that, the results are quite interesting.
The Audi and Porsche have very distinct profile designs so they deserve to be recognized.
The Escape, Santa Fe, Rav4 and CR-V I think have borrowed far too much from each other.
The RDX was the big surprise to me. I don't think I've ever seen one of these model RDX, because I know the model exceptionally well and didn't see it anywhere in the test.