I didn't mean to nuke your efforts... I understood that you were looking for other than the regular answers to the common problems we have all experienced while selling, however I was curious if technology (as you point out KBB pricing for example) has brought new--different enough--objections to the table.
For example; I had never thought about the answer you have for the KBB over valued trade customer.
Way to go, Yago -- scared off another one! (tehe)
Here's a couple technology-based objections:
* Your website told me that my car would be worth $10,000 -- why is it only worth $8,000?
** Or my favorite: EDMUNDS said my car is worth $20,000, but you're only giving me $8,000?!?!?!
* How come you have a lower price on your website for this vehicle?
* This car is listed with 21,000 miles, but the odometer picture says 26,000 miles.
* Your mailer/email says you want to buy my 2005 Civic. I traded that in last year -- don't you people keep track of my vehicles?
* SHOW ME THE CARFAX!
Of course, few of these are really "objections," per se, but more so indicators of a gap in process. Which really then begs the question: are there "modern" vs. "old" objections? I'm thinking the wording may be a bit different, so the responses may need to be worded a bit differently, but the core of the objections are the same.
So, Mr. Kershner, I wouldn't be so fast to chuck those "old BS responses." I'd wager that if you grabbed your old APB Selling Manual, and invested some time in the language, much would still apply.