- Nov 4, 2012
- 462
- 110
- Awards
- 6
- First Name
- Jessica
Clint, can you link me to a copy of the complaint that was filed?
Alternatively you can quote some of the good bits, but I would love to read it.
The California New Car Dealers Association is not seeking any type of monetary settlement, which really gets my wheels spinning. I can't help but wonder if this case is being argued for the sole purpose of establishing a precedent. If that precedent is established, it could be open season on TrueCar! In my opinion (which isn't worth a whole lot), there is a lot riding on this for TrueCar. This isn't about someone trying to force TrueCar to apply for a Dealer or Broker's license. This is about getting them set up for the knock out punch.
Without intent to cast an opinion on whether TC is good or bad, what the CA New car Dealer Association may be trying to do is to stop companies to "wedge" themselves in between the customer and the dealer with a pretext (cheaper car, better deal, different buying experience, etc) and making a profit while doing it.
I am not sure I follow you on this.
The California New Car Dealers Association sued TrueCar, claiming it operates as an unlicensed dealer and broker, prompting debate among forum members about whether the company actually violates state law. While some participants initially argued TrueCar doesn't meet the legal definition of a dealer since it doesn't write up sales, others who reviewed the actual complaint concluded that California's broad Vehicle Code definitions could legitimately implicate TrueCar in violations. A key insight emerged that the association may not be seeking monetary damages but rather precedent-setting to establish grounds for broader action against intermediary platforms that position themselves between customers and dealers.