• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

FTC CARS Act Questions

Fifth District Court Throws Out CARS Rule on a Technicality​


Think of the battle over the CARS Rule as a championship boxing match between two heavyweights: the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the government agency tasked with protecting America’s consumers, and the National Automobile Dealer Association (NADA), a 108-year-old association of over 16,000 car dealers. On January 27, the referee—the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District—stepped into the ring and threw out the FTC on a technicality.

What’s the CARS Rule? Its full name is the Combating Auto Retail Scams Trade Regulation Rule. Its stated purpose is to “add truth and transparency to the car buying and leasing process by making it clear that certain deceptive or unfair practices are illegal.” Examples given in the Rule are misrepresentation of costs (whether buying, financing, or leasing), vehicle availability at a given price, and the cost or benefit of any add-on. Under the Rule, dealers must disclose the offering price, that add-ons aren’t required, and the total of payments for a financed or lease transaction. To the FTC’s credit, it points out that these practices are standard for any honest dealer...

Continue reading
 

✨ AI Highlights

Automotive dealers discuss the FTC's CARS Rule (Combating Auto Retail Scams Trade Regulation Rule), with a forum member preparing to meet with the FTC's Director of Financial Practices to advocate for industry concerns. The thread covers Florida's independent enforcement efforts against undisclosed fees and reports that a federal court vacated the CARS Rule on procedural grounds (inadequate notice), though dealers acknowledge the underlying transparency goals have merit and a compromise may eventually emerge. The key insight is that while dealers view the rule as overreaching, the industry recognizes legitimate consumer protection concerns around pricing transparency, and the outcome may depend on political factors including potential White House oversight of the FTC.

Replies Views 10 2,889 Started Last Reply