• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

Is improving new-vehicle affordability actually showing up in the showroom?

I am arguing that a healthy brand needs a product ladder. Entry-level and premium vehicles can coexist.

100% agreed, but, not all brands need or want that product ladder. Many make a living by owning their place within the spectrum of choices.

Narrow Specialists:
Harley.
Fiat.
Benz.

Full(er) Spectrum:
Hyundai/Geneisis
GM/Chevy-->Caddy
Ford-->Lincoln

etc
 

✨ AI Highlights

Dealers are questioning whether reported gains in new-vehicle affordability are actually moving metal, with the consensus being that high borrowing costs and a hollowed-out used inventory make paper improvements largely irrelevant at the point of sale. Contributors note that customers are stretching to 84-month terms, leaning on trade equity, and finding no realistic step-down option on the used lot — with median used asking prices near $28,000 and only 6.6% of listings under $10,000. A side debate emerges over whether OEMs are driving trim inflation or simply responding to buyer demand, with agreement that brands abandoning entry-level vehicles risk ceding those customers to competitors permanently.

Replies Views 10 2,913 Started Last Reply