Is There Actually a Market for Franchise-Level Websites at $399/mo for Independents?

Not shutting the door on feedback but you have made multiple false statements and I am simply not looking to get into a back and forth about it. I was simply looking for dealer feed back on the question.
You said I made “multiple false statements,” so I’m asking you to point out specifically which ones were false.
To make this easy, here is exactly what I stated:
  1. You asked whether a dealer would pay triple for a “better” website, yet your website isn't better.
  2. I asked what makes you different you never answered.
  3. Your website does not meet ADA accessibility requirements, which puts dealerships at legal risk.
  4. Your websites do not follow Google’s core guidelines and will not rank as well as they could.
  5. A professional checks for coding and structural errors, your sites contain many.
  6. I asked again what makes you different, and again there was no answer.
If any of these points are factually incorrect, please identify them so we can address them one by one.

I do not understand:

Why do so many web developers knowingly deliver websites that fail basic compliance, accessibility, SEO, and technical standards?

In the end it hurts your customer:
  • Dealers end up at an unfair disadvantage online.
  • They are forced to depend on expensive third-party vendors to compensate for issues that should have been prevented.
  • Their own website never reaches its potential.
This ultimately harms the dealer, not the developer.

Your destroying your own customer base, it make dealers believe a website is worth nothing more than $99 because you build paper cutouts of what a website should be.

And your upset at me for pointing it out?

You and every company out there has built a system that is nothing more than a race to the bottom for both the developers and dealerships and I am the bad guy for pointing out something that is destroying everyone.