• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

SEM-PPC-Retargeting

Could it be that the Rosetta Stone V. Google lawsuit rising from the dead is playing a part in this? A number of companies (including Ford) are supporting Rosetta Stone in their suit against Google for accepting keywords that include trademarks. An appeals court just resurrected this suit thought dead in 2010.

Revived Rosetta Stone Lawsuit Spells Trouble for Google

No, this has been the standard for a long time - there wasn't any change. Realistically, I don't think that suit will move much farther forward.

The reason Google does this is just a balance of risk vs. reward. There isn't a system in place where they can effectively manage trademarks, so the potential for suits is larger than the potential for increased spend.

When Google finds a way to effectively manage trademarks, they'll ignore the manufacturers and move ahead. It's just a risk / reward calculation for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

✨ AI Highlights

Stefan initiates a discussion about SEM strategy for auto dealers, asking about outsourcing, quality scores, and measurement, but the thread pivots to two main issues: the effectiveness and ethics of retargeting ads, and Google's increasingly strict trademark policies that are restricting dealers' ability to bid on brand keywords—even for legitimate inventory sales. The consensus suggests that while OEM trademark enforcement may be legally overzealous, Google is unlikely to change course soon due to manufacturer pressure and litigation risk, leaving dealers with limited workarounds beyond directing traffic to OEM-approved websites.

Replies Views 10 5,841 Started Last Reply