Thank You Alex;
At any dealership, the conversation that ultimately results in a transaction is between a consultant and a consumer, right?
And, at AT and Cars, the primary objective is to get the dealers inventory/offering in front of the consumer via online ads - and start the conversation, right?
Both of these have 'the conversation' as the common point of value.
Through the consultant (sales person), AT and Cars could manage these conversations not only from start, but throughout the entire life cycles of consumers' multiple auto purchases. This multiplicity is key.
In auto retail, Alex, as you understand, each year there is a particular number of units sold that defines the overall success of 'our industry'. Why not look at AT and Cars based upon a percentage of this number? Why not ask Chip and Mr. Golub, "what percentage of the total global market do you expect to DELIVER using your products?"
Based upon the percentage, challenge these companies to make their services into transaction-based offerings. So, if AT and Cars say they are responsible for 25% of all auto retail transactions globally, dealers who run the business that hire AT and Cars can assign a specific value to their service offerings.
The consultants (sales persons) responsible for conducting these transactions represent the new client channel for AT and Cars, if they are to come to market with a transaction-based offering.
So, once again, AT and Cars need to offer a service to the consultants that leverages the value of the conversations kept with the consumers
and attach to it a transaction-based revenue model.
Let me know Alex, if this is any clearer. Thanks champion!