She only wanted to make a visitation decision based on the photos.
I started this thread because 4 years ago, I had a brain storm of an idea - to reduce the number of photos attached to my used car inventory being sent to our subscribed marketplace websites
to increase targeted website traffic. I wished that I had been around to further execute and tweak the idea. I had just shy of 3 months to track performance before I accepted a position elsewhere.
Here was the plan:
Less Photos of used car inventory being sent to 3rd party listing sites (autotrader, cars.com etc) with more focus on interior and features
1-2 primary exterior photos with 2-3 exterior feature photos (premium wheels, tow package, etc)
1-2 primary interior photos with 3-4 interior feature photos (media display w/ features, heated seats, leather, etc)
Total 9-12 vehicle photos all together.
Out image overlay branded the dealer but more importantly, I made use of the image overlay for 2 main purposes - 2 call to actions.
1. For more photos, find this vehicle on our website,
www....
2. While you're there, get your $25.00 gift card (for test drive)
I wasn't worried about, nor even thinking about increasing form leads. Most form leads from marketplace sites are less than desirable anyways. At the time I was going after getting the shopper OFF the listing site and over to my dealership website - where I had more information (on that specific vehicle), more photos, my dealers reputation, MY dealers selection of inventory with more points of conversion - the place where a shopper tends to make a decision on visiting the dealership. Once on my website, my focused point of form conversion was the AutoHook lead form, incentivizing the customer to COME IN for a test drive.
Like I said, I didn't get the opportunity to fully see The plan through. Once I left, the dealer went in a different direction. But tracking what I was able to track during the 2+ months:
1. Slight increase in form leads from the listing sites - volume, not necessarily quality.
2. Slight increase in phone calls from the listing sites - "does the car have this or that" type of calls.
3. Increase in referral traffic from the corresponding listing site - direct and indirect (I had dataium tracking installed but this was prior to their partnership with Cars and ATC - it would have been nice to have seen clearer attribution)
4. Increase in AutoHook conversion / incentive form
5. Increase in phone calls from dealer site VDP (dynamic call number tracking)
The increase in 3 was 10-15%. 4 and 5 was 15-20%.
Those where the "trends" I was witnessing for the 2 months I was able to track. We did happen to have 2 very strong corresponding months. The important variable here is the call to action within your listings of less photos. I started off with utilizing the overlay and mid term added a default image to each vehicle, re-enforcing to find the vehicle in our dealer website and to get your $25.00 GC for test drive.
What I was not able to track was any performance sway in walk-in traffic from the listing sites (duh). However, I do believe by providing more photos on a listing website would result in increased "walk-in" traffic, or as Alex calls it "visitation decision based on the photos".
I really wish that I had been able to see this all the way through for a few more months to get a more clear conclusion. In NO WAY take this this plan here to the bank. The testing of this idea was incomplete and not in quite the controlled environment long enough to make a solid conclusion on.
This explains why when I read this statistic from Vast, I had an Ahh-ha moment and wondering if what I was seeing/trending could have had merit.