@JoePistell , oh sure this definately helps! Would be great if there is any data on customer’s removing dealers from their option list if photos are crappy….
And good used (and new) car photos are definitely all about delivering info and not style. Although I must say that the carvana photo’s I saw are uninvolving. Which makes me think why I prefer taking photos outside, but that’s another discussion I suppose.
Of course, will my job get harder when everyone is taking great photos and that’s not a bad thing, I want shoppers to benefit from this. Then there’s the time element. Many dealers (here in NL) simply don’t allow themselves the time to put more effort in their photography.
I don’t know if every shopper in Europe is doing financing at the store, but the process is more or less the same. Here it’s always the value of the trade-in and how much extra cash the customer needs to add.
@LotPop : great point on the higher asking prices for vehicles with the better presentation. It’s not just the first photo, but the amount of photos, the consistent quality and the added promotional text.
@Jeff Kershner : nice example of Mercedes-Benz of Hagerstown. Showing scratches, dings, etc. is always a good thing, but it depends on the asking price I think. You want a $35000,- car to be absolutely perfect, while a $3000 car with 130k miles must have a service history and no engine trouble.
On Lexus RX photo: I like the info displayed at the top. Is that from Homenet? The banner at the bottom is a bit ‘loud’ and obscuring part of a wheel and tyre. And why not add a phone number or URL, for VSR on autotrader or craigslist?