- Aug 11, 2009
- 26
- 0
- First Name
- Rob
I meant to write "don't care" typing in the back of a moving Crown Vic. and no I am not handcuffed.
March 9th when Tim made his announcement on ADM I questioned his "Google + purchase service" with a comment"Seriously? "We are selling +1's for $2 per +1 and offer discounts for large orders." At least your admitting that your gaming the system... My opinion, this is gonna turn out real bad. Just my opinion.)"The Google Plus Game Changer - Automotive Digital Marketing Professional Community
I do not see that comment now, maybe I missed it...
If it were any other site than G+, Google would Blacklist them.Has Google put to much SEO value in the G+ platform (so it is a must have) at a time when nobody is using it therefore forcing people to find whatever means they can to get them?
Yes Yago, Google has placed a lot of SEO emphasis on G+. As a business plan on their part it makes sense. Driving traffic through their assets (G+) to reap their rewards (higher placement). When I replied to Tim back in March, the Panda update was still on the drawing boards. Just looking at how that single update erased (and penalized) those attempting to cheat the system is enough for any reasonable individual to pass on these types of short term solutions.
Quality content, that will earn the 10 - 50 G+ approvals, across the board is the answer.
(Noted: is that my initial comment was removed by Tim or he deleted and restarted the post. Only way I found it was by looking on my wall three or four "mores" down)
So then Tim's offering may be valid since dealers have been left out dry on this review relevance business just because it is more convenient for them to grow their G+ platform.
So I'm not condoning/approving Tim for gaming the system nor Google for playings its cards, I'm just stating--the obvious--so we understand why people do what they do and what ways around it we have as a business.