- May 1, 2006
- 3,755
- 2,733
- Awards
- 13
- First Name
- Alex
Alex,
I meant ....
Maybe I shouldn't quote or agree with you then Yago. I still have trouble understanding what you're trying to say. ESL right
Alex,
I meant ....
Maybe I shouldn't quote or agree with you then Yago. I still have trouble understanding what you're trying to say. ESL right
LOL, sorry.
I just get so frustrated when dealers blame a lower amount of leads to everything including different clouds in the sky that day, rather than the obvious and actual piece we have some control.
I agree with what you're saying but apparently I didn't make my question clear. I'm not at all concerned with the QUANTITY of leads. It's the QUALITY of leads that has seemingly dropped.
When we look at the response rate of our leads it seems like Cars.com leads are just very poor quality over the past few months. It reminds me of when I worked at a store that didn't price their cars online but instead made the user submit a form for an "E-Price". We received tons of leads but they weren't very qualified leads, because they just wanted a price. Maybe it's our vehicles, maybe it's our area, or maybe Cars.com has changed up their call to action a little?
Ricky, glancing at your used car inventory, you have 60 units in stock. This is not a huge inventory. From that, you are carrying about a third with high mileage. I would guess, the late models are Enterprise Rental cars. Please don't take offense but edgy cars don't draw the same caliber leads that super nice cars do. Often, they cheat the book and make good special finance cars.