M
Matt Murray (blog)
Guest
Sorry Larry, but I have to continue the conversation too so Ed and Craig don't get lonely. I found this on your site:
"So how did I come to this 30% benchmark? Ok it starts with my own store were we track everything. We found that we could use the visitors query string data to determine intent and direct visitors to the part of our website that closest matched that intent and when we did so our conversion rate rose 377% to as of this morning 26%. We also found that by tracking and changing certain things about our eBay motors ads we got a higher conversion rate to as of this morning 17%. We also found that using Facebook marketing in ways that were geared to customer interests not so much to customer in market probability we got higher click through and as of this morning a 47% conversion rate, ironically add all of that up and average it and as I write this post we are an average of exactly 30% (there are some decimals there but I am rounding up) and we are a small independent used car operation with none of the brand help dealers have today."
Two things:
1. The average of these #'s might be 30, but that doesn't take into account the volume of traffic to those properties. I could put up a site that says "click here for a free car!" then wait for the first visitor to convert and report a 100% conversion rate. That wouldn't be too fair though
.
2. Averaging Facebook into your conversion numbers is interesting. How are you defining a FB conversion? A "Like"?
Seems like reporting a 30% conversion rate may be a bit misleading in this case.
As a reminder, the main point of the original post is that customers consider a product or many products, move up and down the funnel, then pick a dealership, not just a vehicle. This results in higher conversion on the dealership name.
"So how did I come to this 30% benchmark? Ok it starts with my own store were we track everything. We found that we could use the visitors query string data to determine intent and direct visitors to the part of our website that closest matched that intent and when we did so our conversion rate rose 377% to as of this morning 26%. We also found that by tracking and changing certain things about our eBay motors ads we got a higher conversion rate to as of this morning 17%. We also found that using Facebook marketing in ways that were geared to customer interests not so much to customer in market probability we got higher click through and as of this morning a 47% conversion rate, ironically add all of that up and average it and as I write this post we are an average of exactly 30% (there are some decimals there but I am rounding up) and we are a small independent used car operation with none of the brand help dealers have today."
Two things:
1. The average of these #'s might be 30, but that doesn't take into account the volume of traffic to those properties. I could put up a site that says "click here for a free car!" then wait for the first visitor to convert and report a 100% conversion rate. That wouldn't be too fair though
2. Averaging Facebook into your conversion numbers is interesting. How are you defining a FB conversion? A "Like"?
Seems like reporting a 30% conversion rate may be a bit misleading in this case.
As a reminder, the main point of the original post is that customers consider a product or many products, move up and down the funnel, then pick a dealership, not just a vehicle. This results in higher conversion on the dealership name.