• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

KBB.com makeover puzzlement

All I know is I do not prefer the new site. My sales managers had been seeing the new KBB while it was in "beta" for a month or two, but clearing their cookies made their KBB experience revert to the classic site. Now its nothing but the new format, and its slowing them down a bit.
 
I did a little deep-diving trying to imitate a consumer, and I'm not a fan. The homepage seemed very simple for the scenarios I tested, but once you get inside it is a lot of work for the consumer. You need to recognize tabs for images and the details you visit KBB for. It is easy to lose sight of these tabs with the advertisements and submit a lead focus. To get a value on my trade I lost count of the number of clicks I took to get there. Actually, I never got there - I got frustrated....and I like to think I know what I'm doing.

This is not a consumer friendly site.
 
I agree Alex. I can see where they're trying to go, but they overshot trying to get too much in. This is where Split Testing would help (assuming they haven't already done that ;-)

I am slowly turning to "Time on Site" & "Return Visits" as the 2 top scores for site use. "# of pages viewed" has to be VDP views only for it to have weight.
 

✨ AI Highlights

Automotive dealers are frustrated with KBB.com's redesigned website, finding it cluttered and difficult to navigate despite its "focus group" optimization—the homepage appears simple but buried tabs, excessive ads, and a lead-submission focus make it cumbersome for both salespeople and consumers to find basic information like vehicle valuations. Multiple users report the redesign has slowed their workflows and reduced usability, with one manager unable to complete a trade-in valuation after multiple clicks. The consensus is that KBB overengineered the site by trying to cram too much content in, and would benefit from A/B testing focused on actual user outcomes like time-on-site and repeat visits rather than page views.

Replies Views 6 4,928 Started Last Reply