• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Matt we can agree to disagree on the conversion percentage.

If you want to dive into search personas the formost authority on that subject is Bryan Eisenberg http://www.grokdotcom.com/2008/04/08/bryan-eisenberg-persona-interview/

I love Bryan's stuff but I have a difficult time applying it in a niche like retail auto. Personas are very subtle differences in visitor behavior based on small interactions on the site. Also element placement on site as it relates to the type of persona thst might visit. This is highly complicated and takes a great deal of traffic to do do the multivariate testing nessesary to achieve any confidence levels.

I prefer to simplify the landing and split test big changes, this allows for lower traffic levels to reach confidence levels, easier implementation and much bigger wins.

Given a niche market and low traffic volumes I think any focus on personas is stepping over dollars to pick up dimes.

Just my opinion

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

You are right Larry - Some are higher than 18 and some are lower. The ones who are converting at higher percentages are doing so because they understand the importance of the landing page in conversion. Telling people that they should expect 30-40% conversion is unrealistic when offering a product that has a 90 day average buy cycle.

To move past this discussion, let's refocus on the fact that the data I am sharing shows that there is a real need to think about and capitalize on the different "Search Personas" that exist on the dealer site. If anyone makes it this far down on the page, please know that the goal is to reinforce the need for more customer focused website pages. Think about the different needs that any one customer might have and design a website experience that caters to their needs. Many providers allow for their clients to add pages to their site or edit navigation where they see fit. Taking advantage of these opportunities will create a site that delivers a solid user experience that is more likely to convert.

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Matt if you have a person that is going make statements that I am "pulling things out of my butt" and that I should "back off" you should expect I am going to come back pretty strong with what I believe backs up my belief.

Never said that Dealer.com doesn't have passion or expertise I don't know enough about Dealer.com to make that claim. I do think your platform is limited in it's capability to produce higher conversions and continous conversion improvement, but no more than anyother website provider.

If that is an 18% avg conversion rate there are 5% converting sites & some 30% converting sites I would think so why would it be a problem if I tell a dealer his site should convert at 30% plus? Not only that the data proves my point all of those dealers have the same platform and same opportunity. However some have figured out how to work what they can in it and others are just sitting back hoping something happens.

"It's not the site providers job to give the dealer a working site, just a funtional one." the dealer has to make it work.

I can't speak for your company as a whole but the people I know and have met at Dealer.com do seem to get it. However none of us know all of it.

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

"If this is causing Dealer.com a problem I suggest you find a way to get there before I do, but don’t take the AutoTrader approach and try to convince dealers it’s not possible just because Dealer.com can’t do it."

This is my post Larry, not Alex's. I work for Dealer.com and well before Alex worked here he was on the DealerRefresh team. You say "Dealer.com can't do it" in the face of an average conversion rate at 18% over many hundreds of accounts. This, therefore, means that we do have dealers above that mark. You have a client at 20%, I can tell you that we do to, and it's not because of off-site landing pages, squeeze pages or anything other than solid ad text, deep linking and robust sites.

Using Amazon is not a good example. Cars are the second largest purchase a person will make in their life, meaning the consideration phase of the buying cycle is significantly longer. Comparisons between a single dealer and Amazon are not effective.

You have passion and conviction for your strategies, I admire that. Don't for a second think that the Dealer.com team doesn't carry passionate, driven individuals with the technical expertise to bring real success to the industry. That's what we're here for.

Any time you would like to discuss data with me feel free. In the interim please remember that Dealer.com got to where we are today because we were born in a used car dealership. We get it.

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Actually “Random Access Website” is not a Larry Bruce term although I wish it were. Where it comes from isn’t important if you must know email me and I’ll direct you there.

Let me take your examples one at a time. Now here I can only guess what is going through the minds of the CMO’s at these companies and of course I am not privy to all that they are doing from and online marketing stand point. I will tell you what I know and why I think the decision are made to use deeplinks vs a Microsite in each of these cases.

1. EBay – in my opinion embay is resting on its brand. They haven’t been aggressive online or off for some time. Right now if you Google “toys” you will not likely find eBay items listed anywhere on the SERP page one, and it’s November the beginning of the holiday shopping season. Same if you search “used ford trucks”, my estimation they aren’t doing much of anything when it comes to web marketing they are using word of mouth. If you think about it eBay gets paid by the listing weather the item sells or not so what's their real motivation? There are a couple of entities in the car business like that too, but that is another post entirely.

An interesting side note on eBay according to compete.com of their top 5 referring sites 4 is Facebook at 6.98% and 5 craigslist @ 3.27% that may seem like small percentages but when you consider that eBay’s unique visitors last month were 65+ million that all of the sudden becomes a big number. Point being who do you think is doing this? eBay? No, it’s the sellers on eBay putting items on their Facebook pages with links and on craigslist. When you have sellers doing this and other search marketing tactics for you, why do you need to do anything else?

2. Edmunds.com – easily the smallest of the examples you gave at 6 million unique visitors per month. Their top five search terms driving traffic again according to compete.com all brand terms but one “used cars” .24% of 6 million unique visitors. According to alexa.com there SEM activity has been medium at best and they are bidding on some very generic broad terms: “cars”, “huyndai”, “bluebook” ect. when you're selling data in hopes to get a click or a name you can resell and your are bidding on terms this broad then you really can’t build a Microsite that will focus traffic because you are casting a wide net and for lack of a better term, crossing your fingers that net catches something. Edmunds model just doesn’t lend itself to landing pages.

3. Amazon.com – without a doubt the most aggressive of the 3 examples and I can tell you without a doubt they use landing pages, squeeze page, microsites ect. they use every bullet in the gun. Now they also have a network of affiliates that use these same tactics to convert at very high numbers.

Alex of all the examples you have given Amazon is the closest to our business and they use the tactics I have discussed in this post in depth. Depths I would love to discuss with their CMO who would never tell me all I would want to know.

Alex there is no doubt that what I am talking about takes manpower, I have seen the marketing department at Amazon in Seattle and I can tell you, the employee comp for Amazon’s marketing dept. is more than the total gross profit for most dealerships. That is the reason I started MicrositesByU to do this for dealers that needed it, to provide a platform for dealers that wanted to try it themselves and a platform for other online marketing agencies that wanted to get into conversion marketing instead of selling traffic.

Yes Alex I am telling dealers that their website should be converting at 30% to 40% and I will stand behind that number. This is hardly a number I have, as you so eloquently put it, “pulled out of my butt”. It is based on data. So here is my explanation of that number:

First I’ll start with your own numbers that come from this post admittedly Matt has put an 18% conversion rate on branded terms that you are getting right now. This is with no Split testing or multivariate testing that I am aware of or have ever seen data on that Dealer.com has done, so if you start doing some testing to see what you can do to get more conversion do you think you could find 12% more? Sure you could, I can tell you this… I could.

The only reason MicrositesByU hasn’t is the first two website vendors we tried working with (neither were Dealer.com) we got such tremendous push back it was unreal. As a matter of fact one sizeable website provider that I won’t name here the CEO said and I quote “Dealers are not paying us enough to work that hard to figure out how to convert more leads, what you are talking about doing is too much work”. That’s when I decided we needed a behavioral targeting technology to place on a dealerships websites to get the traffic off the main website site so we could do it without involving the provider…just too much trouble.

Second let me point you to a small consulting client Mike Warwick, Internet Director at Lawless Chrysler Jeep who right now gets 20.52% conversion on his website www.lawlesscj.com . Mark writes in a Kain Automotive post (http://kainautomotiveideaexchange.ning.com/forum/topics/website-visitor-conversion?xg_source=activity) “I would read all of Larry Bruce’s posts on website conversion optimization. I’ve applied many of his concepts and the results have been fantastic.” Mark still has no ability to test either.

Now I’m not tootin my own horn, I am trying to make you aware that these principals are proven. Outside this industry there are entities that would fire the CMO if their conversion rate was 20% on branded terms.

Lastly I will leave you with this analogy. You have a salesperson in your dealership who gets 3 ups a day coming in asking specifically for him, that’s 78 ups a month.

Out of the 78 ups per month, that are asking specifically for him he is getting information in the CRM system for only 14 of those ups every month and he is selling 8 cars per month. What are you going to do?

Well you're not going to fire the guy he is selling cars and more importantly he has a lot of people asking for him so he is obviously prospecting hard. You are going to work with this guy to help him get more information and to work with the desk to close more deals that’s what any of us, would do. That’s what I tell dealers in every session. This is probably the part you didn’t hear Alex, Any dealer reading this comment please pay particular attention to this next quote:

“It is not your website provider’s job to give you a working site. It is their job to give you a functional site. It is your job to figure out what works for your market and your customers and work with your website provider to make your site work for you.”

So as you can see Alex I am not exactly “Pulling things out of my butt” I would have hoped by now you knew me well enough to know everything I do is based on data. Just because I haven’t done it YET doesn’t mean it can’t be done and just because Dealer.com can’t do it doesn’t mean it can’t be done. The data inside and outside this industry supports these numbers and we will get there. It will not be long Alex and I will have hard data to support this. I don't think it is unfortunate at all some people are listening, in fact I am glad that conversion marketing is rising up and proud if I had anything to do with it. If this is causing Dealer.com a problem I suggest you find a way to get there before I do, but don't take the AutoTrader approach and try to convince dealers it’s not possible just because Dealer.com can’t do it.

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

I had to Google the term and the only thing I could find was one of your blog articles that mentioned Random Access Website without a definition of what it was as well. I assume this is a Larry Bruce term?

Anyway, I get what you're saying in regards to that term. Isn't that every public and spiderable website though? If it is a bad thing to direct customers to these pages then why do companies like eBay, Edmunds, or Amazon do it?

I do understand what you're saying about having an extremely targeted microsite that isn't public or spiderable to do nothing but be a lead conversion site. You probably could get to a conversion rate in the area you're talking about by using this method, but let's get real. What dealership has invested the man power, time, effort, experience, knowledge, and money to do all this? If you're saying "hire Larry Bruce for this" then let's take things a step further:

I wasn't at Digital Dealer 9, but I have heard from numerous dealers that you're telling people their website should convert at 30-40%. You have even admitted in this comment string that you, yourself, have no clients that are getting to these heights. You also stated that "if you’re just guessing you’ll never get it." Isn't that exactly what you're doing right now?

Larry, I'm not trying to paint you as a fool. I think you're on to some potentially good points that could help our industry, and maybe with time you'll get there. The problem I have is that you're jumping out of the gate trying to make things you pulled out of your butt into fact. Unfortunately, some people are listening to you and it is creating issues. My advice is that you should take a step back, get some time and true data on your side and then start making claims that support reality.

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Random Access isn’t a disparaging term, its an adjective.

Basically it means your main website can and often is accessed by random traffic that cannot be controlled and with no understanding of how the traffic got there, and once the traffic arrives on site the respondent can randomly access any part of the site taking them off the conversion path.

Sorry I should have defined that term.

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Ok my first thought is that this post is more about the types of conversions than why the visitor converted or how to get more of them to convert. According to a study by TMP Directional and ComScore 46% of all lead conversions happen on the phone (http://www.dmconfidential.com/blogs/column/Search_Engines/2446/), and a recent MIT study in 2009 showed that a call is 22 times more likely to get a sale than any other type of conversion (http://www.leadresponsemanagement.org/lrm_study). So it shouldn’t be by accident that calls are respectively 3 to 1 and 20 to 1 that should be by design. As a matter of fact when we build out landing experiences for PPC campaigns we intentionally push a call over a form submission for all the reasons above and in this post.

Additionally, I'm not sure I would have used new, used and service as my segmentation buckets for this test. It shouldn’t be shocking that a new and used visitors both behave similarly on your site, the funnels for finding a new or used car and converting for each are exactly the same so in the end the visitor has no choice but to behave the same way, that’s how you designed it.

This brings in my biggest contention with website providers today, ALL OF THEM! There is very little a dealership can do to differentiate themselves in any website provider’s platform, particularly in the most important areas, the listings page and the details page because these are shared across every dealer in the platform, as Alex S would put it “Equal Incompetence”.

“The page view difference in this study is a result of less used cars of the same type or model to choose from. that’s not behavior that’s logistics.” Very, very few visitors are coming to a dealerships site to build a car. By the time they get to the dealers site they have already decided what they want to buy and it is now a matter of do you have it, how much is it and how do I get it.

You did however hit on the top 2 things that a visitor is looking to do on a dealerships main website:

1. Find a car

2. Schedule a service appointment

“DO” is the operative word here. The problems you should be solving on a dealerships website are ones that help visitors do the things they want to do, faster.

As for conversion, well I think I would want to see this broken out by branded vs. non branded terms (dealer name vs. high value non-name related terms), sales and service. A blended 12% rate isn’t good in my opinion, we want to see branded terms on a website convert at 30% plus. NOW, let me caveat that with we don't have a dealership doing that yet, my company is new and the oldest client I have right now is 60 days old. 30% plus is our goal and this is why I believe it is possible. The user typed in your name into a search engine their clear intent was to find your dealerships website. The only reason they don't convert is because you don't give them what they need to do so.

We believe we can achieve this through a series of off main site pages or microsites and our behavioral targeting technology to intercede at certain pages in the main website and/or redirect to offsite pages that focus on what we can determine as user intent. By doing this we can also split test the offsite pages and offers in real time, something not possible with any website company I know of today. I say this because I do not believe anyone can get to a 30% plus conversion rate without a clear test driven strategy, if you're just guessing you’ll never get it.

“18% for branding (name related key terms), I wouldn’t call that a pretty big number. I would call that a little less than average number for the same reasons I stated above.”

As for buying your name, first thing I would say is “keywords don't convert landing do”. With that said I would ask to see that data. Are the search terms the same? Is the landing the same? Were both the organic listing and the paid listing on page one and was the organic listing in the same position respectively to the paid listing (ex: paid listing in position 2 and organic listing in position 2)? If not that would skew your results of the test dramatically. I would wager there are some differences that would cause this to happen that have nothing to do with the ad being a sponsored link. Again you have to go back to user intent which is clearly to find that store and by human nature they are going to complete their intent unless there are some dramatic circumstances that stop them from doing so.

Last but certainly not least “Deep Linking vs Off page landing” this is actually the softball in this whole post. YOU NEVER, EVER WANT TO SEND PAID TRAFFIC BACK YOU YOUR RANDOM ACCESS MAIN WEBSITE…EVER!

1. With deep linking you still have all of the site navigation that will distract your customer out of the conversion funnel lowering you conversions.

2. When you deep link you are assuming that one page is going to do it we have very very very few landing experiences that are one page most are 3 some as many as 10 pages. With a deeplink or a single page you are assuming a one size fits all mentality and this post started out dispelling that notion immediately. Let me add to this before someone brings it up, a dynamic landing page where you are changing the picture or a header isn’t a custom landing that is closely connected to your promise. That’s just perfuming the pig; it doesn’t do a damn thing for conversion.

3. There is absolutely no way to split test a deeplink page with in any providers website right now for a lot of the reasons I stated above in this comment and if you can spit test you can’t get high conversions or continuous improvement.

Those are the top three there are many more but t this comment is already too long.

Well there you have it, be careful what you ask for you just might get it! :)

Hope that helps, of course I am sure that there are questions or clarifications on what I have said here everyone knows I am certainly willing to answer them and help where I can.

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Ok my first thought is that this post is more about the types of conversions than why the visitor converted or how to get more of them to convert. According to a study by TMP Directional and ComScore 46% of all lead conversions happen on the phone, and a recent MIT study in 2009 showed that a call is 22 times more likely to get a sale than any other type of conversion. So it shouldn’t be by accident that calls are respectively 3 to 1 and 20 to 1 that should be by design. As a matter of fact when we build out landing experiences for PPC campaigns we intentionally push a call over a form submission for all the reasons above and in this post.

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Kevin - are you just trying to stir the pot now? We bring Larry in here and we're going to have one very long comment string - lol.

I'm with Matt on the idea of primarily deep-linking to my own site that I put the most time and effort into. However, I also like the idea of un-branding myself to capture leads on a microsite for things like bad credit conversion, trade-in only pages, and other things. It would be interesting to run two PPC campaigns side by side on the same terms (one that pushes to my main site and one that pushes to a microsite) to see which one performs better. I'm sure the results would vary by market and theme, but it would definitely be interesting. Maybe da Bruce can speak more to that?

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

@JD & Tom - The 4X conversion shows itself on paid traffic that comes through the dealership name. I haven't looked at total conversion comparison simply because of the challenge in tracking true conversion from organic traffic.

@ Kevin - Love that you're in the conversation here. You're absolutely right about the service traffic. Those visitors need something - and need it now, making them much more likely to call. Now the debate between PPC specific microsites that gen leads VS a strong deep linking strategy is an interesting one. Without any numbers to share this morning I will tell you that I am definitely more in favor of deep linking to your own site - especially for sales customers who may need the added benefit of build and research tools or reviews to make their final decision. The content on the main site is much more robust and can serve to answer questions that an isolated landing page may not.

Now that the can of works is open... anyone gonna take the bait?

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

I am not surprised at the difference in phone calls for service vs. sales. Our service customers are using the Internet instead of the phone book to find us, and they are used to calling for scheduling a service appt. On the other hand, sales customers are often still in their consideration phase and often do not want to talk to a sales rep yet, so they are more likely to submit an electronic lead. All good info Matt, now do you want to start up the debate with ppc landing zones vs. deep linking within your actual site? (had to open that can of worms, lol)

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Excellent information, Matt! The control attributed to PPC can never be disputed - turn it on, turn it off, target specifically, create landing pages - those are the things that I love about PPC.

Regarding buying ads for the dealership name, my only warning to dealers would be to make certain that those particular keywords are parsed separately in reports. There are some companies out there that use dealer name keywords to inflate their performance. These are normally companies who charge $X for Y traffic and end up pocketing a lot of the dealer's spend.

For example, they may say, "The average cost per visitor on all of the individual keyword is $1.45. Our relationship with Google allows us to charge $1.10 per visitor, so we'll charge you $2200 for 2000 visitors."

Sounds like good math, but it's not. If 70% of the clicks they deliver are the dealership name and the average cost per click on those keywords is $0.30, then their actual cost is around $1290...

... which means that over 40% of your spend is being pocketed.

With that warning in mind, everything that Matt said was spot on. I would love to see the data that points to 4X better conversion rate on PPC clicks, but the conclusions all make sense. PPC = great data + additional supplemental clicks that you control.

Great post!

Is PPC a window to all visitor behavior?

Every customer who arrives at your site has a unique experience.  If you don’t take the time to understand the multitude of possible experiences on your site, you might be missing enormous amounts of opportunity.  Ask yourself a simple question:  “What are the different problems I can solve for my customers?”  You’ll find out quickly that the many solutions you offer your clients are not found on your site.  This is the basic premise behind search personas.  To read more on search personas, check out Marketing in the Age of Google.

Paid search allows us to segment data to better observe these funnels of customers and understand how they behave differently, therefore justifying the need to treat them differently.  We separated Used, New and Service customers and dove into the data.

We looked for high-level indicators of behavior:  Page views per visit and Calls per form submission.  Page views:

PPC-Views-Ratio.gif

Used and New customers behaved very much alike, visiting 2 and 3 pages per visit respectfully and landing solidly at 3 calls per form submission.

Phone-Ratio-Sales.gif
To be fair, the difference between new and used shoppers seems pretty small.  But we’re talking an average of one less page view over a full month’s worth of clicks to all of the dealers who use our paid search.  That’s pretty significant.  I think the explanation for the difference is pretty simple.  There are a lot of extra tools and resources for the new car customer. Build and research tools and reviews are definitely contributors here.

Service customers came in at 2 page views per visit and a whopping 20:1 call to form ratio.

Phone-Ratio-Service.gif

The service customer showed their preference for the phone loud and clear.  This is a confirmation of our gut instincts, but it’s certainly good to see it on paper.  We are seeing that service customers only view 2 pages per visit.

Might the lower page views per service customer visit be attributed to dealers focusing very little attention on fixed ops?

PPC-Conversion-12.gifNow the number that everyone talks about is conversion.   We looked at conversion across all of the keywords in the new, used and service departments:

12% is a good number, I was pleased to see that.  There is more to this story though.

There is a set of keywords that cannot be attributed to a specific profit center.  Things like the dealership name fit into this category and these keywords tend to do a lot of heavy lifting… they drive a lot of traffic.  Because searchers who use dealership name cannot be deep linked to a profit center, the page views per visit goes up to 5.  Calls per form rises to 5:1 as this is a grouping of sales and service customers.

Phone-Ratio-5to1.gif

The interesting story unfolds with a look at conversion on dealership terms however:

PPC-Conversion-18.gif18%.  This is a pretty big number in the conversion world. Given what we know about used and new sales performance though, I think there is a story here.  Customers do their research, move up and down the purchase funnel considering different makes/models etc.  During this process they are taking in advertisements from all of the local dealers. When it’s time to make the leap to leaving a lead what do they do?  They Google the Dealership name, head to the site and contact the dealership.  Proof.

There are certainly other stories to be told here and I would love to hear other perspectives on what folks take from this data.

What does this mean to the dealer: Advertise on your name, regardless of the medium.  Too many people ask “Why should I bid on my name in paid search, we’re #1 in organic?”

Answer: Yes, the number of people who click on the dealership name in PPC is much less compared to the number of people who click on the organic listing.  However, the conversion rate on the people who clicked the PPC ad is 4 times higher.  To take this a step further, PPC is a quick and easy way to capture all those customers who may misspell your dealership's name.  Google does a good job of trying to correct searchers' mistakes, but they're not perfect.

I can only say all of this because PPC gives us the most accurate view of our visitors' behavior.  Is it a clearer window to your visitors?  I would say yes.

Alex Jefferson is Mr. GQ on Digital Dealer Magazine

@JD- I could have sworn we took a pic together. Maybe that was another JD??? What was in your cup? LOL.
http://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?fbid=4809328...

@Joe – You always have great info to share. It was great to finally meet you as well.

@Gil – Long time no see man…You gotta be at DD-10 so we can hang!

@April – Thanks Dollface. Great seeing you again at DD9. See ya at DD10.

Filter

🔥 This Week 5 threads · 38 posts
Marketing & SEO
PPC Fraud and bad oversight - at 92% of dealerships
Steve Stauning argues that PPC fraud and waste are rampant at dealerships, largely driven by OEM ...
Website Trade-In / Purchase Tool
A dealer asks about building a custom in-house trade-in and car buying data collection tool after...
AI SEO or GEO building ideas
Dealers and vendors are exchanging strategies for getting dealership websites cited in AI-generat...
Tech & Data
Anyone have experience with data lakes
A dealer group operator asks for vendor recommendations and advice on building a data lake to pow...
General
Slate - the vehicle we have been needing
Dealers and industry pros discuss the Slate EV, a $25,000 bare-bones electric pickup that emphasi...
Get this delivered every week