IMO, Avinash was poorly prepared. We're all sitting there waiting for him to drill down into our world, but he never made it to us.
At the beginning of the presentation they mentioned that 2400 people were logged into the presentation. IMO, with a count that large, a great number of listeners were dealers. I can't be sure, but it’s a logical conclusion.
I don't believe he had any idea of what his audience makeup was. If it's 90% dealers, then craft the presentation to your audience. If it was a big mix, he could pre-announce to us all how widely diverse the audience is and how he'll need to "keep it fairly generalized" to apply to all. An Example to clarify: If he presented to the Pool Table industry and based his presentation to the manufacturers, what good is it to the retailers that sell the tables?
His presentation was aimed squarely at auto manufacturers and was of little help to auto dealers. The auto dealer has unique search difficulties and unique search opportunities because of their local presence. Dealers cannot do competitive marketing intelligence using Google trends because our traffic counts are too small. He has long tail as a Paid Search solution and long tail is a no-brainer for non-paid search.
I can go on and on, I don't have time to break out all of the details, but IF the audience was mostly car dealers, then Avinash did not have any idea what his audience consisted of.
Avinash had some excellent points. I like using the bounce rate and visitor loyalty as excellent metrics of shopper satisfaction. But his 60 min presentation was simply a 1,400 word per minute caffine induced race around the planet.
I can't help but think that Avinash's presentation was no different than having a junk landing page for a PPC search term. My "visitor loyalty" score for him will be not good.
just my $0.02
Joe