• Stop being a LURKER - join our dealer community and get involved. Sign up and start a conversation.

FTC CARS Act Questions

Tallcool1

Boss
Mar 17, 2014
673
473
Awards
8
First Name
Clint
I am going to be sitting in a meeting with the FTC's Director of Financial Practices next week.

If anyone has any specific questions that they would like addressed, please let me know. I have a list of some, but I am sure that this group will have a lot more than what I have.

It would be easiest if you post them here to avoid duplication. You can of course message me if you prefer.


Clint
 
Just an FYI -- looks like FLORIDA is jumping on its own little version of the CARS Act, at least in relation to advertising. As noted, they are pretty much just enforcing existing law. Pretty much closes down DOC Fees, recon fees, credit fees, what want more fees, even more fees, etc, etc. Only government fees (TTL) allowed to be added to the price displayed.


View: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f3lk0wVsNrNct6TXmvMMd49X4TelKPIs/view?usp=sharing


Any thoughts?
 
Just an FYI -- looks like FLORIDA is jumping on its own little version of the CARS Act, at least in relation to advertising. As noted, they are pretty much just enforcing existing law. Pretty much closes down DOC Fees, recon fees, credit fees, what want more fees, even more fees, etc, etc. Only government fees (TTL) allowed to be added to the price displayed.


View: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f3lk0wVsNrNct6TXmvMMd49X4TelKPIs/view?usp=sharing


Any thoughts?

If more states had done this on their own, there wouldn't be a CARS Rule.

That's my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex Snyder
I read somewhere (today) that the Court ruled in favor of NADA and the TIADA. The reason was failure to provide adequate notice, not the terms of the actual rule itself.

I am expecting the FTC to regroup on this and provide notice in the near future.

I have not seen an official release on this.
 
I read somewhere (today) that the Court ruled in favor of NADA and the TIADA. The reason was failure to provide adequate notice, not the terms of the actual rule itself.

I am expecting the FTC to regroup on this and provide notice in the near future.

I have not seen an official release on this.
I’d be surprised if this resurfaces with the current administration.
 
From the consumer perspective, it is tough to argue with more transparency in payments and pricing. I agree the FTC CARS Rules have gone too far, but I'm betting there is a compromise to be found.

How much did NADA help Trump get elected?
Agreed. Transparency in payments and pricing is a great thing. This rule went way overboard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex Snyder