- Apr 20, 2009
- 701
- 708
- Awards
- 8
- First Name
- Ryan
This hit automotive news yesterday afternoon. Refresh was the host of one of the more constructive, if not lively, discussions about TRUECar's reverse auction and DMS data usage. Did anyone get the FTC letter?
http://www.autonews.com/article/201...r&utm_content=buffer8b335&utm_medium=twitter#
It seems to me that this is an incredibly slippery slope for the FTC to "investigate" based on public information found in an industry forum. That is hardly collusion since it is NOT secretive or illegal.
What do you make of this? Lord knows I've often wished that the FTC would investigate some of the false advertising that goes on around faked review content, but I never expected them to investigate dealers for publicly sharing an opinion of a Vendor's business model.
Very Interesting...
http://www.autonews.com/article/201...r&utm_content=buffer8b335&utm_medium=twitter#
It seems to me that this is an incredibly slippery slope for the FTC to "investigate" based on public information found in an industry forum. That is hardly collusion since it is NOT secretive or illegal.
What do you make of this? Lord knows I've often wished that the FTC would investigate some of the false advertising that goes on around faked review content, but I never expected them to investigate dealers for publicly sharing an opinion of a Vendor's business model.
Very Interesting...
Last edited by a moderator: