2. I agree with poor call-to actions. Lets step back and ask "why" are they "poor"? Mostly due to being old and stale. We've been using the same call-to-actions for over 15 years now...
- Get your price quote
- Get your e-Price
- Get your internet price (bad)
- Get your trade-in value
- Request sale price
- Schedule test drive (less performing)
- Check availability (this was a good one for awhile and may still have some life to it)
I may have missed a few, but I've made my point. In one way or another our Call to Actions have not changed. Most are based around PRICE - Receiving a Price from the dealership.
Most consumers are going through their 3rd, 4th, 6th purchase while using the dealership website as a shopping tool. At one point or another most have responded (more than once) to the like call-to-actions, ONLY to find the process was
NO different - the experience was the same (if not worse). It's unlikely they received a real price quote after giving up their information. Instead they were called and emailed over and over with no real answer to their questions.
The only outcome was those "
4 words that make sales managers sound stupid".
I propose we remove ALL lead forms and replace the CTA with the a much different one Call-To-Action - something more engaging (like a stellar chat session) or an incentive that drives the customer physically into the dealer showroom. SOMETHING Different.
One PRIMARY Call-to-Action - not 13 CTA rainbow buttons lined up along the side of a vehicle photo. ONE primary engaging CTA that's gains all of the attention for possible conversion.
We have become industry - dealers and vendors alike, that measures their performance of their website and "internet marketing departments" by lead count alone.
I hear it all the time "How can we get more leads from our website?" "We need more leads" - meanwhile they have a less than average closing ratio and are clueless to what their lead-to-show rate is, since they're not even measuring it.
Why is that?