What you do with it
access wholesale inventory across Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, and Cadillac brands, so they can maintain a sellable lot and generate revenue from new-vehicle transactions
When a dealer holds a GM franchise and needs a steady supply of new vehicles to sell
tap GM's iMR (inMarketRetail) program to fund approved vendors such as live chat, mobile apps, and website providers, so they can offset dealership marketing and technology costs with manufacturer reimbursement
When a dealer wants to leverage OEM co-op dollars for marketing and technology tools
comply with GM's evolving operational and brand requirements, so they can retain access to dealer-excellence incentives and avoid allocation penalties
When a dealer needs to meet GM's standards for digital presence, facility appearance, and lead response to protect incentive eligibility and vehicle allocation
Community evidence
→ Stable
The DealerRefresh community acknowledges GM's functional role as the unavoidable franchisor supplying inventory and co-op funding, and notes genuine value in the iMR program expanding access to approved vendors like live chat and mobile apps. However, the dominant sentiment is negative: dealers and industry voices consistently describe GM's mandates — from CarBravo enrollment fees and 24/7 lead response requirements to digital signage costs, forced CDK/Cobalt tool adoption, and facility standardization rules — as coercive, financially burdensome, and disconnected from real dealership operations. Several threads portray GM's digital initiatives (eBay Motors pilot, Chevrolet.com, Flex/Cobalt SEM) as underperforming or poorly executed, compounding frustration that compliance is effectively non-optional given allocation leverage. Positive voices are sparse and tend to be GM announcements or vendor approvals rather than organic dealer endorsements.
Coercive compliance and allocation leverage6 mentions
Mandatory cost burdens (fees, digital signage, platform costs)7 mentions
iMR program enabling vendor funding3 mentions
Underperforming or poorly executed digital tools (Cobalt, Flex, Chevrolet.com, eBay pilot)5 mentions
Lead quality and response requirement issues3 mentions
GM digital/innovation initiatives received skeptically by community4 mentions
Facility and brand standardization overriding dealer autonomy2 mentions
OEM website traffic and conversion problems2 mentions
50 mentions · 9 positive · 21 negative · Scored from 20+ years of candid DealerRefresh discussion. Scores shift as new conversations happen.
NEUTRAL
"General Motors' 2009 pilot program selling new vehicles through eBay Motors in California, which generated significant interest (16,000+ listings) but minimal actual sales (45 in the first nine days), ultimately leading GM to quietly discontinue the initiative"
eBay Motors and General Motors Promotion →
NEUTRAL
"His depth of knowledge of the auto vertical — having worked with Ford, Chrysler and General Motors, to name a few — is invaluable as he builds our go-to-market strategy for these marketers hungry for innovation."
PebblePost Names Rich Flynn VP Sales, Automotive →
NEUTRAL
"I know Ford, GM, and BMW have mobile apps that can read or control things from outside the vehicle.... who else has them?"
Which OEMs have telematic apps? →
NEUTRAL
"Jeff Kershner shared the November 2016 General Motors iMR Approved Turnkey Vendor List, which includes vetted vendors for services like online dealer chat and email/directory solutions"
Latest GM iMR Approved Turnkey Vendor List →
NEUTRAL
"It has since evolved into a leading website and automotive digital marketing company on the strength of of its relationships with companies such as General Motors and Lexus."
ADP buys Cobalt? →