• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

The problem with conversion ratios for Dealership Websites

Jeff asked that I revisit my “Conversion Ratio Myth” argument here on DR, and this time I’ve got pretty graphs to back myself up. I know, you’re hooked already.

The reason I’m always on my high horse about conversion ratios is simply because it’s an unreliable metric for our industry, and I’ve always felt that it’s our job as front-runners of the Internet revolution to prevent dealers from falling back into the old thinking of “Internet = email inquiry”. It ain’t that simple, and it’s detrimental for your store to think that way.

The problem with conversion ratios in our industry is that conversion measurements are best-suited for e-commerce sites, and we’re not e-commerce in any way, shape or form (yet). There are so many things that can happen on a dealer’s web site that could be viewed as a successful visit, yet most of these would never be flagged as a conversion…it’s wrong for us to assume that our site fails if it doesn’t turn a visitor into an email lead.

Now, you could use conversion ratios to measure changes you’ve made to your site functionality, although there’s still plenty of opportunity there for misinterpretation. But most dealers focus harder on marketing their sites to bring in traffic than they do on maximizing user experience once the traffic gets there… and that’s where the conversion ratio ceases to make any sense as a gauge of success, because as a regional business, the more ground your advertising covers, the less effective it gets.

See, all this fancy new marketing you’re doing – SEO/SEM, blogging, social media marketing, etc. – negatively affects your conversion ratio. The visitor most likely to convert to a lead is the one who sought out your dealership specifically: either someone who typed your store’s URL directly, or ran a search query for “Joe Smith Toyota”. But neither of those things require significant marketing savvy on your part … those are your core customers who want to buy from you and just happen to be using the Internet. Anything you do beyond that is hypothetically hurting your conversion ratio, especially in the case of blogs and social media, where you may be hooking users into your site from hundreds of miles away.

conversion_graph1.gif


conversion_graph2.gif


So all this leading-edge Internet marketing is decreasing your conversion ratio… should you give it all up and stick to your cake customers for the sake of a 9% conversion? Well, last time I checked, no one in this business got paid on conversion ratios. The more robust your marketing strategy, the broader your presence, the more traffic you’ll pick up, the more units you’ll roll. That’s what it’s all about.
Guest posting by Mitchell Turck
Internet Consultant with WebNet Services

AOL Autos Launches Largest Site For Used Car Listing

We feed our inventory to VAST for about 90% less in cost than what we pay AutoTrader monthly... Yet AOL is one of the top 10 most hit websites in the world. When AutoTrader lost this account, they lost a significant amount of value in what they are providing us as dealers. IMHO = VAST provides a great "bang for the buck", AutoTrader is providing less for more money... Kevin Frye/eCommerce Director/Jeff Wyler Auto Family/ www.wyler.com

Statement from Husker BMW - the other side of the story

Husker BMW is not to be congratulated for its public relations work. It has now posted on its website, and elsewhere, that it "honors all contracts" -- so it admits this was a contract with the buyer -- and that the buyer's "bet" on e-bay lead to the winning price. So now e-bay is a place where gamblers go.

And it has patted itself on the back with a totally false description of what went on, claiming the customer "knew" there was a "mistake" on e-bay (he asserts the opposite), and that Husker went the extra mile to make him happy. That's not spin. That's lying.

Also, Husker had an attorney not associated with VTAIG write a letter threatening the buyer and everyone posting on the 'Web with a defamation lawsuit.

It's been amateur hour all the way, bringing disgrace to dealers everywhere.

At every step the dealer did something wrong or stupid. It let this go on too long. It should have unconditionally agreed to the sale. It should not have started to brag about how it honors "all contracts."

Somebody needs to set the record straight as you guys want to spin this, too, and in doing so you make it harder, not easier, for good dealers to learn from this cacaphony of mistakes, lies and frauds.

Statement from Husker BMW - the other side of the story

CS -

The video named someone and ridiculed him. Although it was posted on DR to show how far things can go, it also broke site rules. I think the retraction note says it all. If you want to see it so bad, I'm sure you know how to use Google or YouTube ;)

I've been watching this whole thing for a while. The customer posted the whole scenario on the M3 forums. He even posted his approval check with his name on it. The dealership wasn't posting any of the customer's information he hadn't already done himself.

Mr. Tanisaka got his car, and things have settled down. I'd just view it as a what-not-to-do thing at this point.

Statement from Husker BMW - the other side of the story

I found this story late, but it hasn't been handled well by anyone.

Neutral this, neutral that. Censoring content you have previously published isn't a neutral move, that's a retraction of a previous statement. Besides, if this was a muckraking video I want to see it : )

Now, with the dealership's rebuttal, they have violated the privacy of this potential buyer by discussing where he does his banking with the whole world. If customer was to take legal action this web page could be evidence.

If the dealership f*cked up they should continue to own up to their mistake instead of trying to lay out a new argument against the customer because of his financing options.

1. customer tries to buy car
2. customer is laughed at
3. customer seeks advice from other consumers
4. seller insults customer for emotionally describing how he was offended

Everyone loses.

Filter

🔥 This Week 5 threads · 35 posts
Tech & Data
Rank the CRMs
A 12-store dealer group on Elead/CDK is exploring a switch and asks the community to rank automot...
Used Car Acquisition Costs - 1st Party vs. Auction
Alex Snyder shares DMS data analysis showing customer-sourced used cars (trades, street buys, lea...
Marketing & SEO
Which third-party lead sources are still worth the money?
Dealers compare notes on which third-party lead sources — Cars.com, CarGurus, Autotrader, TrueCar...
Community
Best of the Best — On The Move
The thread celebrates industry moves and achievements, spotlighting John Quinn joining InFocus So...
General
Looking for honest feedback on an idea. Turns car snaps into professional car listing photos.
An early-stage founder named Dyllan is seeking honest feedback on a tool that transforms casual c...
Get this delivered every week