Can integrated CRM systems replace the DMS?
- CRM, ILM, Chat, Desking, Emails, Phone, SMS
- 20 Replies
Brian
You raise some very interesting points some of which are valid and some of which are a little off base. Also you seem to have a myopic view of the DMS market.
I agree with your assessment... "They depend on the functionality that the software brings but they hate long-term contracts and the cost associated with the technology." of which I assume you are talking about ADP and R&R. If you view the market as ADP and R&R (myopic) then you are spot on BUT this is not what is actually happening in the DMS market today. Non-legacy DMS vendors are, on a daily basis, talking market share from both R&R and ADP owing to the validity of your statement. You wrote in your response to one of the posters "There is an underlying opportunity that smart companies see; tap into the high dissatisfaction with current DMS pricing, functionality, and data integration. " This is EXACTLY what is happening now. My company, Auto/Mate, along with the likes of Dealer Track, AutoSoft and ACS to name just a few are capitalizing on the archaic technologies and business strategies that make up ADP and R&R.
You have to ask yourself why are there multiple silos of data being kept by the dealer. Data from their 3rd party desking solution and data from their 3rd party CRM solution and data from their DMS solution (read ADP / R&R). Well the main reason is that intrinsically no matter what ADP and R&R say, they believe the DMS system that the dealer pays for is theirs and not the dealers. Both ADP and R&R have had a history of making it difficult for the dealer and 3rd party vendors (CRM / Desking / etc) to access their databases hence the term "hostile interface". In current years they have softened their stance in that they now have "certification programs" which are still costly to 3rd party vendors. The new DMS companies like Auto/Mate and Dealer Track have open API's that allow bi-direction integration to a single data silo that is housed on the DMS. Auto/Mate Open/Mate API even allows realtime updating of any 3rd party vendors system data.
There will always be dealer who wants one stop shopping..all products from one vendor. As one dealer I spoke with said "I just want one throat to choke" . But the truth of the matter is that dealers want to be able to choose. To choose the best CRM and the best desking and the best web appointment system, and the best etc., and to have these seamlessly integrate with the DMS system that houses the data. This is what products like Open/Mate are all about.
As the President and CEO of a DMS company I believe in giving my dealers what they want and what I am hearing is flexibility to choose and to know that even though I may not purchase the CRM product from my DMS vendor that my DMS vendor has my back as to ensuring that 3rd party product I purchase will work in the environment of my DMS.
You are probably correct. As Bob Dylan wrote "The times they are a changing" and the DMS vendor who doesn't understand that will most certainly die....
You raise some very interesting points some of which are valid and some of which are a little off base. Also you seem to have a myopic view of the DMS market.
I agree with your assessment... "They depend on the functionality that the software brings but they hate long-term contracts and the cost associated with the technology." of which I assume you are talking about ADP and R&R. If you view the market as ADP and R&R (myopic) then you are spot on BUT this is not what is actually happening in the DMS market today. Non-legacy DMS vendors are, on a daily basis, talking market share from both R&R and ADP owing to the validity of your statement. You wrote in your response to one of the posters "There is an underlying opportunity that smart companies see; tap into the high dissatisfaction with current DMS pricing, functionality, and data integration. " This is EXACTLY what is happening now. My company, Auto/Mate, along with the likes of Dealer Track, AutoSoft and ACS to name just a few are capitalizing on the archaic technologies and business strategies that make up ADP and R&R.
You have to ask yourself why are there multiple silos of data being kept by the dealer. Data from their 3rd party desking solution and data from their 3rd party CRM solution and data from their DMS solution (read ADP / R&R). Well the main reason is that intrinsically no matter what ADP and R&R say, they believe the DMS system that the dealer pays for is theirs and not the dealers. Both ADP and R&R have had a history of making it difficult for the dealer and 3rd party vendors (CRM / Desking / etc) to access their databases hence the term "hostile interface". In current years they have softened their stance in that they now have "certification programs" which are still costly to 3rd party vendors. The new DMS companies like Auto/Mate and Dealer Track have open API's that allow bi-direction integration to a single data silo that is housed on the DMS. Auto/Mate Open/Mate API even allows realtime updating of any 3rd party vendors system data.
There will always be dealer who wants one stop shopping..all products from one vendor. As one dealer I spoke with said "I just want one throat to choke" . But the truth of the matter is that dealers want to be able to choose. To choose the best CRM and the best desking and the best web appointment system, and the best etc., and to have these seamlessly integrate with the DMS system that houses the data. This is what products like Open/Mate are all about.
As the President and CEO of a DMS company I believe in giving my dealers what they want and what I am hearing is flexibility to choose and to know that even though I may not purchase the CRM product from my DMS vendor that my DMS vendor has my back as to ensuring that 3rd party product I purchase will work in the environment of my DMS.
You are probably correct. As Bob Dylan wrote "The times they are a changing" and the DMS vendor who doesn't understand that will most certainly die....