• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

AI = Awesome Intelligence

Am I allowed to say that I am developing a realtime realistic video avatar that can dynamically change the UI to answer user queries and gather details? The loom link is here.

Point is, typing is a hassle with chatbots and when a user calls he expects a human not an AI. As users get savvy about AI calls, its gonna have a blowback. But when they willingly interact with an AI avatar which helps answer their questions and even fill forms they don't feel cheated by it. Its the most ethical way of using AI and then handing off warm lead to a human. Not only that because it is visual can show relevant content by controlling UI its arguably better UX than a voice call. Not to mention calling is an extra step where large portion of website visitors fall off.

Curious to know what you guys think about it.
 
What is your fav voice-to-text tool?

Love using Whisper flow.
You mean STT? You don't have to pay for it, small openAI whisper models can run in your browser and get you all the functionality you need. when I deployed a service for myself on bare metal. I used a whisper v3 large on ct2 runtime. Its a standard library you can use to spin up your own stt service thats scalable.
 
Claude power users, do you have a rich inventory of skills and plugins? Is your Opus/Fable output having bouts of obvious stupidity? Does it miss simple logical steps, does it invent steps?

Your skills and plugins maybe conflicting each other and/or the markdown content/structure was made for the older models when long, deep rules were needed to steer the output.

My output was so frustrating that I've spent 20+ hours getting it right and it's still not what I wanted. So, I created a brand new sterile Claude Max account and ran 2 identical deep analyses. Results:

"Your full Claude stack adds a strong interpretation layer. It also oversteers the model."

ugh. Back to the lab..
 
  • Hilarious
Reactions: MattCopley
Claude power users, do you have a rich inventory of skills and plugins? Is your Opus/Fable output having bouts of obvious stupidity? Does it miss simple logical steps, does it invent steps?

Your skills and plugins maybe conflicting each other and/or the markdown content/structure was made for the older models when long, deep rules were needed to steer the output.

My output was so frustrating that I've spent 20+ hours getting it right and it's still not what I wanted. So, I created a brand new sterile Claude Max account and ran 2 identical deep analyses. Results:

"Your full Claude stack adds a strong interpretation layer. It also oversteers the model."

ugh. Back to the lab..
When you discover it... Claude Integrates with Hrizn MCP for Seamless Content Creation | Matt Copley posted on the topic | LinkedIn
 
POWER USERS:
When you are in AI for deep research and complex analysis, and it's output is so complex it takes you 20 mins to unpack it all?

Paste this prompt below into your thread, It's awesome:
It's been a long day and my brain is fried, talk to me like I'm 5.
Only report to me in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English. That means approved plain words, active voice, and one instruction or idea per sentence. Small words, short sentences, short paragraphs. If you have to use a big word, explain it right after. Only return what's actually necessary.
Just tell me what you did, did it work, what do I do now.

If you use it, please give me a like.

p.s. sorry if this is a dupe post, I love this prompt and I cant recall if I posted this before (& a search didn't find it)
 
Well… this is where MCP starts getting practical.
ChatGPT and Codex can now securely connect to Hrizn.

So picture a GM asking:
What aged inventory actually deserves attention this week?

Or a marketing director asking:
Where do we have content gaps around vehicles we actually have in stock?

Or an agency asking:
What is Signal seeing across my stores, and what should we do about it?

Then Codex can take that same dealership context and help build the workflow around the answer.

No exporting spreadsheets.
No rebuilding the dealership’s context inside every new AI tool.
The permissions and intelligence already exist in Hrizn.
You bring the interface you want to work in.

I think that’s where this gets interesting for dealers.

Your data shouldn’t become less useful just because somebody prefers a different interface.

Connect_Hrizn_to_ChatGPT.png
 

✨ AI Highlights

  • Claude and Gemini replaced ChatGPT for coding, planning, and research tasks
  • AI avatars with cloned voices fooled real people including spouses
  • Dealers built agents to stock inventory and find auction vehicles autonomously

A running thread where automotive AI power users share wins, tools, and hard-learned lessons from deep AI workflows. Key themes include the 'yak shaving' trap of spending days building elaborate AI systems that turn out to be useless, the problem of over-customized Claude setups that degrade output quality, preferred voice-to-text tools like MacWhisper and Whisper, and practical prompt tricks for simplifying complex AI responses — plus a vendor teasing MCP-based dealership data integrations with ChatGPT and Codex.

Replies Views 67 16,097 Started Last Reply