• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

AI = Awesome Intelligence

Am I allowed to say that I am developing a realtime realistic video avatar that can dynamically change the UI to answer user queries and gather details? The loom link is here.

Point is, typing is a hassle with chatbots and when a user calls he expects a human not an AI. As users get savvy about AI calls, its gonna have a blowback. But when they willingly interact with an AI avatar which helps answer their questions and even fill forms they don't feel cheated by it. Its the most ethical way of using AI and then handing off warm lead to a human. Not only that because it is visual can show relevant content by controlling UI its arguably better UX than a voice call. Not to mention calling is an extra step where large portion of website visitors fall off.

Curious to know what you guys think about it.
 
Claude power users, do you have a rich inventory of skills and plugins? Is your Opus/Fable output having bouts of obvious stupidity? Does it miss simple logical steps, does it invent steps?

Your skills and plugins maybe conflicting each other and/or the markdown content/structure was made for the older models when long, deep rules were needed to steer the output.

My output was so frustrating that I've spent 20+ hours getting it right and it's still not what I wanted. So, I created a brand new sterile Claude Max account and ran 2 identical deep analyses. Results:

"Your full Claude stack adds a strong interpretation layer. It also oversteers the model."

ugh. Back to the lab..
 
  • Hilarious
Reactions: MattCopley
Claude power users, do you have a rich inventory of skills and plugins? Is your Opus/Fable output having bouts of obvious stupidity? Does it miss simple logical steps, does it invent steps?

Your skills and plugins maybe conflicting each other and/or the markdown content/structure was made for the older models when long, deep rules were needed to steer the output.

My output was so frustrating that I've spent 20+ hours getting it right and it's still not what I wanted. So, I created a brand new sterile Claude Max account and ran 2 identical deep analyses. Results:

"Your full Claude stack adds a strong interpretation layer. It also oversteers the model."

ugh. Back to the lab..
When you discover it... Claude Integrates with Hrizn MCP for Seamless Content Creation | Matt Copley posted on the topic | LinkedIn
 

✨ AI Highlights

  • Claude and Gemini replaced ChatGPT for coding, planning, and research tasks
  • AI avatars with cloned voices fooled real people including spouses
  • Dealers built agents to stock inventory and find auction vehicles autonomously

Automotive professionals and AI power users share wins, frustrations, and hard-won lessons from daily AI tool use, covering model quality degradation between releases, the 'yak shaving' trap of spending days building automated systems that turn out to be useless, and technical issues like plugin conflicts oversteering Claude outputs. Key tools discussed include WhisperFlow and MacWhisper for voice-to-text, while one developer showcases a real-time AI video avatar concept designed to ethically replace phone calls in dealership lead capture.

Replies Views 64 15,195 Started Last Reply