AI = Awesome Intelligence

[joe.pistell]

What is your fav voice-to-text tool?

Love using Whisper flow.

 

[Alex Snyder]

What is your fav voice-to-text tool?

Love using Whisper flow.

MacWhisper here. I wanted a pay once solution that didn't make calls to the cloud. Mostly because I wanted something contained to my personal AI operating system.

 

[AbrahamJaffar]

Am I allowed to say that I am developing a realtime realistic video avatar that can dynamically change the UI to answer user queries and gather details? The loom link is here.

Point is, typing is a hassle with chatbots and when a user calls he expects a human not an AI. As users get savvy about AI calls, its gonna have a blowback. But when they willingly interact with an AI avatar which helps answer their questions and even fill forms they don't feel cheated by it. Its the most ethical way of using AI and then handing off warm lead to a human. Not only that because it is visual can show relevant content by controlling UI its arguably better UX than a voice call. Not to mention calling is an extra step where large portion of website visitors fall off.

Curious to know what you guys think about it.

 

[AbrahamJaffar]

What is your fav voice-to-text tool?

Love using Whisper flow.

You mean STT? You don't have to pay for it, small openAI whisper models can run in your browser and get you all the functionality you need. when I deployed a service for myself on bare metal. I used a whisper v3 large on ct2 runtime. Its a standard library you can use to spin up your own stt service thats scalable.

 

[joe.pistell]

Claude power users, do you have a rich inventory of skills and plugins? Is your Opus/Fable output having bouts of obvious stupidity? Does it miss simple logical steps, does it invent steps?

Your skills and plugins maybe conflicting each other and/or the markdown content/structure was made for the older models when long, deep rules were needed to steer the output.

My output was so frustrating that I've spent 20+ hours getting it right and it's still not what I wanted. So, I created a brand new sterile Claude Max account and ran 2 identical deep analyses. Results:

"Your full Claude stack adds a strong interpretation layer. It also oversteers the model."

ugh. Back to the lab..

 

[MattCopley]

Claude power users, do you have a rich inventory of skills and plugins? Is your Opus/Fable output having bouts of obvious stupidity? Does it miss simple logical steps, does it invent steps?

Your skills and plugins maybe conflicting each other and/or the markdown content/structure was made for the older models when long, deep rules were needed to steer the output.

My output was so frustrating that I've spent 20+ hours getting it right and it's still not what I wanted. So, I created a brand new sterile Claude Max account and ran 2 identical deep analyses. Results:

"Your full Claude stack adds a strong interpretation layer. It also oversteers the model."

ugh. Back to the lab..

When you discover it... Claude Integrates with Hrizn MCP for Seamless Content Creation | Matt Copley posted on the topic | LinkedIn

 

[joe.pistell]

POWER USERS:
When you are in AI for deep research and complex analysis, and it's output is so complex it takes you 20 mins to unpack it all?

Paste this prompt below into your thread, It's awesome:

It's been a long day and my brain is fried, talk to me like I'm 5.
Only report to me in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English. That means approved plain words, active voice, and one instruction or idea per sentence. Small words, short sentences, short paragraphs. If you have to use a big word, explain it right after. Only return what's actually necessary.
Just tell me what you did, did it work, what do I do now.

If you use it, please give me a like.

p.s. sorry if this is a dupe post, I love this prompt and I cant recall if I posted this before (& a search didn't find it)

 

[MattCopley]

Well… this is where MCP starts getting practical.
ChatGPT and Codex can now securely connect to Hrizn.

So picture a GM asking:
What aged inventory actually deserves attention this week?

Or a marketing director asking:
Where do we have content gaps around vehicles we actually have in stock?

Or an agency asking:
What is Signal seeing across my stores, and what should we do about it?

Then Codex can take that same dealership context and help build the workflow around the answer.

No exporting spreadsheets.
No rebuilding the dealership’s context inside every new AI tool.
The permissions and intelligence already exist in Hrizn.
You bring the interface you want to work in.

I think that’s where this gets interesting for dealers.

Your data shouldn’t become less useful just because somebody prefers a different interface.

 

[Scalesperson]

Am I allowed to say that I am developing a realtime realistic video avatar that can dynamically change the UI to answer user queries and gather details? The loom link is here.

Point is, typing is a hassle with chatbots and when a user calls he expects a human not an AI. As users get savvy about AI calls, its gonna have a blowback. But when they willingly interact with an AI avatar which helps answer their questions and even fill forms they don't feel cheated by it. Its the most ethical way of using AI and then handing off warm lead to a human. Not only that because it is visual can show relevant content by controlling UI its arguably better UX than a voice call. Not to mention calling is an extra step where large portion of website visitors fall off.

Curious to know what you guys think about it.

-----------

Very cool, Abraham. I'm curious to know how you're handing knowledge bases, product knowledge and personas? Is the AI pulling the inventory feed live?