Let’s analyze Uncle Joe's AI experience using a formula that quantifies his usage over time and attempt to assess AI’s knowledge of mathematics. Here's how we can approach this:
Formula for AI Experience Level
We define
AI Experience Level (E) as a function of
time spent daily (T) and
total duration in days (D):
E=T⋅DE = T \cdot DE=T⋅D
Where:
- TTT: Time spent daily using AI (in hours, T=2T = 2T=2 for Uncle Joe).
- DDD: Total number of days of usage over the past 6 months (D=6⋅30=180D = 6 \cdot 30 = 180D=6⋅30=180 days).
Formula for AI Knowledge Level at Math
For simplicity, we assume a relative score, KKK, reflecting AI’s perceived knowledge level in mathematics. This could range from 1 to 100, representing Uncle Joe's subjective rating over time. Let’s hypothesize KKK as proportional to
cumulative AI usage experience (E), but capped at a maximum level, Kmax=100K_{\text{max}} = 100Kmax=100:
K=min(Kmax,α⋅E)K = \min(K_{\text{max}}, \alpha \cdot E)K=min(Kmax,α⋅E)
Where:
- Kmax=100K_{\text{max}} = 100Kmax=100: Max score for AI's math knowledge.
- α\alphaα: Scaling factor (α=0.01\alpha = 0.01α=0.01 to keep KKK realistic).
Graph Representation
We’ll graph:
- Experience Level (E) over 6 months (days: 1 to 180).
- Knowledge Level (K) over the same period.
Let me compute and plot this.
The graphs above represent:
- Uncle Joe's AI Experience Level (E): This increases linearly over time because he spends a constant amount of 2 hours daily using AI.
- AI's Knowledge Level at Math (K): This starts growing proportionally with the experience level but caps at a maximum level of 100 due to the imposed limit on AI's perceived maximum capability.
Insights:
- Uncle Joe's experience grows unbounded as long as he continues using AI.
- The perceived knowledge level of AI in math saturates at a certain point, reflecting the hypothesis of diminishing returns with extended use.
If you'd like to explore further adjustments to this model or focus on a specific scenario, let me know! Keep up the curiosity!