- Nov 7, 2016
- 12
- 1
- First Name
- Caleb
I would say it's a grey area. Definitely legal because of the fine print but not something I would want to be involved in...
I think it matters because dealers are paying 3-4 times and getting ripped off. We pay for a website from a vendor. We pay to drive traffic to the website with traditional and digital budgets. We pay for 3rd party websites which would not exist without dealer inventory. We then pay some of those same companies for SEM/PPC...they take the user info from traffic that dealers spent money on to drive traffic to those websites and sell the info back again to others (competitors) and then even back to us.Advocate.
Does it matter? Our personal digital lives are so exposed already. We have ZERO control over that. Outside of upholding PPI, why should we even care if our businesses' (assumed anonymized) data is being used? Can we assume it is being used to make our experiences better within those products or that it is helping to fund those products so that our direct costs aren't rising? Are we just mad because we have direct costs and think we can bully these companies around?
</fuel thrown on fire>
I think it matters because dealers are paying 3-4 times and getting ripped off. We pay for a website from a vendor. We pay to drive traffic to the website with traditional and digital budgets. We pay for 3rd party websites which would not exist without dealer inventory. We then pay some of those same companies for SEM/PPC...they take the user info from traffic that dealers spent money on to drive traffic to those websites and sell the info back again to others (competitors) and then even back to us.
Who is worse:
1) Marketing companies like SEM, Display, and Website companies or 2) DMS companies?
Dealers are allegedly being charged multiple times by the same vendors—first for website hosting and traffic, then again for third-party leads, and a third time for SEM/retargeting services—because companies like Oracle, BlueKai, and Lotame are purchasing and reselling visitor data from dealer sites and lead aggregators like AutoTrader and Cars.com. While participants confirm this practice is real and buried in fine print, opinions diverge on whether it's problematic: some argue it's unethical double-dipping that warrants contractual data-ownership protections, while others contend that anonymized data usage is standard in the digital economy and may actually improve targeting. The thread underscores a fundamental tension between dealers' desire to own their customer data and vendors' business models that monetize that information.