• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

Do we still care about sales appointments?

Alex, I still think appointments matter. The problem is we made the appointment count the goal instead of the next step.


If the customer agreed to a real time, the vehicle is there and ready, and somebody owns the visit, that’s an appointment.


If they said, “I might stop by Saturday,” and we put it in the CRM so the board looks better, that’s not an appointment.


I’d still track set, show and sold. I’d just rather have 10 real appointments than 25 pencil-whipped ones.


Mr. Appointment can stay. He just has to stop counting maybes.

Let's see if I can remember where my head was at 8 years ago when I made that post... I can only guess I was seeing a lot of appointment gamification that was leading to poor show rates.

I am not against setting appointments in any way, shape, or form. I'm against pay plans that are too focused on setting appointments and not focused enough on selling appointments.
 

✨ AI Highlights

Alex Snyder questions whether the automotive industry's obsession with scheduling and tracking sales appointments actually improves customer show rates and sales outcomes, or if it's an outdated metric that compromises the customer experience. Steve Stauning counters with data showing that properly executed appointments (referred to as "The Perfect Appointment") achieve 80%+ show and close rates versus 20-30% for traditional walk-in traffic, along with shorter transaction times and higher grosses. The thread highlights a key industry debate: whether the real value lies in the appointment itself or in executing a structured, customer-centric appointment process.

Replies Views 11 4,083 Started Last Reply