- Oct 29, 2009
- 771
- 895
- Awards
- 10
- First Name
- Rick
Vendors write business at NADA. Smaller, more internet-centric conferences, not so much. The difference is more decision makers (Dealer Principals and General Managers) attend NADA.Looks fun, but nah... I'm out of that elbow-rubbing, pay-to-play shindig gang. Just like we discussed with DDs, very few vendors land clients at these things. I'm unsure why the small to mid-sized vendors attend to be honest...? Unless their captains are speaking or an attempt to seem relevant. The vendor groups that I worked for found it a waste of money. TBH.
Dealers on the other hand, maybe they find solutions at the break out sessions...? Those can be fruitful, IMO.
It'd be great to see some verifiable stats / data on that claim. I get the decision maker parts, that's a good point, higher profiles.Vendors write business at NADA. Smaller, more internet-centric conferences, not so much. The difference is more decision makers (Dealer Principals and General Managers) attend NADA.
I've worked a number of NADA conventions as well as smaller shows like Digital Dealer. The amount of business that is written at NADA is considerably larger than the smaller shows. It's worth noting that many DPs attend NADA and come home and then inform their BDC Manager or Digital Marketing Director that they spent a sizeable amount of the budget on X, Y, or Z.It'd be great to see some verifiable stats / data on that claim. I get the decision maker parts, that's a good point, higher profiles.

First time since about 8 years ago I'll be there. All GM's and controllers from our group are heading down for our quarterly meeting and to take in the show. Not sure what to expect and have tried to plan it out a bit but it's mind bending.
Automotive professionals discuss their attendance plans for NADA 2019, with debate centered on the show's value proposition. While some argue it's highly lucrative for vendors willing to prepare strategically and useful for dealers to network and find solutions, others view it as an "elbow-rubbing, pay-to-play" event with questionable ROI for mid-sized vendors. The thread ultimately reflects divided opinions: supporters value both business opportunities and community connection, while skeptics question whether the show justifies costs, especially given vendor quality concerns and January/February scheduling issues.