So this isn't really accurate - I do agree that a faster site results in better conversion rates, but CWV has pretty much nothing to do with how a website ranks organically. Sure, site speed has some influence, but not the CWV speed score... and the other 3 metrics have no influence at all.
And more importantly, CWV has nothing to do with Google Ad performance.
Does that mean we shouldn't pay attention? Not at all - but we should also understand that CWV really doesn't influence how you rank organically...
Thanks for the feedback, Greg. For the record, I wasn't sharing my opinion on the matter, I was restating what Mueller has stated publicly.
*The key clarification for me is to say that CWV is not the single factor in determining page rank, of course. A "used BMW" dealer in Atlanta should always outrank a "Nissan" dealer in Atlanta when a user is searching for "used BMWs Atlanta," regardless of who's passing CWV or not, of course.
From Mueller (Article link:
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/ranking-factors/core-web-vitals/Article link:
Are Core Web Vitals A Ranking Factor?):
"In 2021, Google hosted a half-hour 'Ask me anything' session on Web Vitals. During the
AMA, someone asked if page experience is a binary ranking factor.
Philip Walton, a Google engineer working on web performance, answered that Web Vitals were mostly not a binary ranking factor.
During the AMA, John Mueller, Google Search Advocate, confirmed that while CWV affects rankings, relevance also plays a strong role. If website A is faster than website B, but B is more relevant to the search user’s query, website B would still outrank A.
Mueller also noted that websites moving from 'needs improvement' to 'good' may see ranking improvements. But websites that are already good and improve speed by a millisecond or two may not see ranking changes."
But the brutal truth is most of the Automotive CWV failures can't be solved with a millisecond or two improvement. If only...
Another 25-year SEO and regular contributor for Search Engine Journal, Roger Montti, posted the following (Article link:
CWV & Google Page Experience Ranking Factor Updated):
"While the influence of the Page Experience Ranking Factor may be on the lower side [for CWV], it’s still important for reasons outside of algorithms like improving conversions and ad clicks."
For every second of page speed load time you're losing 20% conversions and you're see real-world performance data with CWV, not simulated lab data.
We're living this reality every day at Overfuel. We've delivered the foundational tech that passes CWV and now the struggle is to convince dealers to avoid 3rd-party widgets causing performance failure with little to no upside.
Here's my personal opinion: Any dealer spending a dime on local SEO content publishing (and we sell this offering at Overfuel), Google Ads, and other marketing tactics before deploying a website foundation that passes CWV is throwing good money after bad. Passing CWV is a best practice...unfortunately, just not in Automotive.