But the "Faster Horse" story is about innovation and it seems that Mr. @ruggles is turning the argument on it's head to argue for no change at all - in effect, arguing for the status quo.
The "New Coke" analogy is apt here.
But the "Faster Horse" story is about innovation and it seems that Mr. @ruggles is turning the argument on it's head to argue for no change at all - in effect, arguing for the status quo.
There is no such thing as status quo in auto retail. Everyone gets swept up in the tide at some point. Then there are those who chase every shiny new object. If you want to refer to negotiation as status quo and accuse me for defending it, you are wrong on a variety of levels. First, pretending not to negotiate is just another way to negotiate. And until you change things at the FTC, ours will remain a business of negotiation. You choose the approach you want to take. If you want to be the ultimate in transparency, we'd like to see you try that on your own nickel and report back to us with the results. If you want to try "relative transparency," go for it. Just call it what it is. And if you figure out that your competitors are using your strategy against you, and you decide to take a different route, I'm sure you'll tell us, right? But don't tell us that all of these people are abandoning negotiation, because they're not.The "New Coke" analogy is apt here.
I never said Auto Nation....You did!So when AutoNation says:
Are you saying they're being dishonest?
You don't think this is the best policy?
I'm trying to get a read on your personal stance here.
DittoThere is no such thing as status quo in auto retail. Everyone gets swept up in the tide at some point. Then there are those who chase every shiny new object. If you want to refer to negotiation as status quo and accuse me for defending it, you wrong on a variety of levels. First, pretending not to negotiate is just another way to negotiate. And until you change things at the FTC, ours will remain a business of negotiation. You choose the approach you want to take. If you want to be the ultimate in transparency, we'd like to see you try that on your own nickel and report back to us with the results. If you want to try "relative transparency," go for it. Just call it what it is. And if you figure out that your competitors are using your strategy against you, and you decide to take a different route, I'm sure you'll tell us, right? But don't tell us that all of these people are abandoning negotiation, because they're not.
Yall are so civilized. I just love kanucks! What we have here in Colorado is a dealer board that closely scrutinizes dealerships, advertising, pricing etc. They have the ability to shut a dealer down immediately without a "trial" The board consist of elected officials (a public official, retired/dealers and 2 "non auto" members)To be clear, I'm from Ontario and we have this lovely thing called OMVIC.
They're an entire department dedicated to consumers not getting ripped off by car dealers.
They fine dealers for incorrect pricing, not showing all-in prices, not doing paperwork properly, etc.
So I think the whole matter is a bit different on my home turf - if you advertise a price you have to sell for that price and all the prices are compared on AutoTrader, etc so those that want to play the price game can do so relatively well with confidence because when they arrive at the dealer with the print out of the price they liked, the dealer has to sell for that price. The dealer can always go lower, but we don't have any dealers falsely advertising low prices and then inflating them upon customer arrival.
Did they say anything about being transparent as to profit?So when AutoNation says:
Are you saying they're being dishonest?
You don't think this is the best policy?
I'm trying to get a read on your personal stance here.
To be clear, I'm from Ontario and we have this lovely thing called OMVIC.
They're an entire department dedicated to consumers not getting ripped off by car dealers.
They fine dealers for incorrect pricing, not showing all-in prices, not doing paperwork properly, etc.
So I think the whole matter is a bit different on my home turf - if you advertise a price you have to sell for that price and all the prices are compared on AutoTrader, etc so those that want to play the price game can do so relatively well with confidence because when they arrive at the dealer with the print out of the price they liked, the dealer has to sell for that price. The dealer can always go lower, but we don't have any dealers falsely advertising low prices and then inflating them upon customer arrival.
If you price your vehicles competitively with the rest of your market - shouldn't the negotiation process become less important?