• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

Best lead sources today for internet leads

Question for everyone based on the close rates Alex shared: What are you actually paying per lead from these third-party sources? The close rates are interesting, but without knowing the cost per lead, we're missing a big part of the economics.
In Alex's post, at a 6.4% close rate and $50 per lead, that's approximately $781 in lead acquisition spend per vehicle sold—before any additional marketing or sales expenses. And if you are paying for duplicate or bad leads, the effective cost could be even higher.
I'm curious what everyone is actually paying per lead across Autotrader, Carfax, CarGurus, Cars.com, and the others. Are you evaluating these providers on close rate alone, or on total acquisition cost per vehicle sold?
 
@The QR Code Guy

Good callout. I think it is also worth mentioning that the sold count is greater than show here for ATC and Cars. I can only think of two ways that happens:

1. Manual attribution - the rep is giving credit to a source that may not be the actual source.
2. We're counting solds in the month they sold and leads in the month they were submitted. That can skew a close %. A q3 average view should be long enough to compensate for that though.

What am I missing?

1794412154939.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: The QR Code Guy
1. Manual attribution - the rep is giving credit to a source that may not be the actual source.
2. We're counting solds in the month they sold and leads in the month they were submitted. That can skew a close %. A q3 average view should be long enough to compensate for that though.

Absolutely. The data is from VinSolutions, but my source tells me it was similar to eLead. Both systems are antiquated and only provide single-source attribution.

On top of that, AutoTrader is the easiest option to click in the drop-down salespeople see when they're adding a new customer because of alphabetical ordering.
 
Following up on my earlier question about what dealers are actually paying for third-party leads. I took the Q3 close rates shared in this thread and did some simple math, assuming a hypothetical $50 cost per good lead across all platforms.

PlatformQ3 Close RateCost per Sale
Autotrader9.4%$532
CarGurus6.8%$735
Cars.com6.6%$758
Carfax4.7%$1,064
Edmunds4.0%$1,250
TrueCar3.8%$1,316
Overall6.4%$781
A few important caveats: These are illustrative calculations, not actual platform acquisition costs. Each provider has different pricing structures, some pay monthly subscription fees rather than per lead, and the attribution issues discussed earlier can affect the reported close rates. But look at the difference between a 9.4% close rate and a 3.8% close rate. At the same assumed lead cost, that's nearly 2.5 times the acquisition expense per sale. :-O And this is before factoring in other marketing expenses, sales personnel, and operational costs.
 

✨ AI Highlights

Dealers debate which third-party lead sources deliver the best ROI, anchored by Q3 close-rate data showing AutoTrader leading at 9.4% and TrueCar trailing at 3.8%. The conversation quickly expands beyond raw close rates into cost-per-sale economics, attribution reliability problems in CRM systems like VinSolutions, and the strategic value of third-party sites for capturing high-funnel shoppers who won't visit dealer websites. The key takeaway is that close rate alone is an incomplete metric — cost per lead, attribution accuracy, and upper-funnel brand visibility all need to factor into any decision to cut or consolidate third-party spend.

Replies Views 24 2,489 Started Last Reply