• Stop being a LURKER - join our dealer community and get involved. Sign up and start a conversation.

CarGurus - significant drop in traffic?

kevinfrye

Sr. Refresher
Apr 7, 2009
254
176
Awards
1
First Name
Kevin
Had a visit with CarFax and they shared this graphic below, which indicates that recent changes to the Google algorithm has created a huge drop in traffic with CarGurus (competitor A) down to the level of AutoTrader and Cars.com. Source is SEMrush. Not sure how accurate this is - curious as to everyone's thoughts - especially in light of the 30% rate hike that CarGurus has been hitting dealers with in the first quarter of this year.

upload_2019-4-2_9-6-42.png
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: Ian Isch
Visit Generations Digital

Alexander Lau

Banned
Feb 11, 2015
2,493
763
First Name
Alex

ChrisR

Boss
Oct 12, 2015
412
381
Awards
1
First Name
Christian
I'm just jealous of *only* a 30% increase for Q1. They tried to hit me for 60%.
 

Colin Rodger

Lot Lizard
Feb 5, 2019
22
22
First Name
Colin
I haven't been at CG for a while now, but I think the CarFax slide may be a little misleading, in that the chart only shows the traffic for the top 20,000 keywords, whereas CG, if I'm not mistaken, bids on millions and millions of keywords. The CarFax slide may be accurate for those top 20,000 keywords, but when looking at the whole picture (ie millions of keywords) the traffic hit may not be significant.
 

ryan.leslie

One of the good guys
Apr 20, 2009
626
575
First Name
Ryan
@Colin Rodger, Thank you. I think you may have partially answered the question I hadn't yet asked. I love DealerRefresh!

Similar results on the graph despite a smaller subset of keywords doesn't feel misleading to me, so long as the smaller set is relevant. That appears to be the case since the dip for CG looks consistent in both.

If I'm wrong someone please correct me. I'm here to learn.
 

jon.berna

D.R. Truth
Nov 14, 2011
175
236
First Name
Jon
It's important to establish a distinction in the reports between a percentage of change compared to a prior period versus the variable trended. Say for example you hear a city's murder rate is up 266% versus last year, at first glance it sounds like a war zone right?

That could be 3 in 2017 and 11 in 2018, so in this case the percentage of 266% over-emphasizes the change versus the underlying values.

This makes a provider starting from a lower prior period look better in YOY change when the totals are a different story. It it feels like data spin...
 

Alexander Lau

Banned
Feb 11, 2015
2,493
763
First Name
Alex
It's important to establish a distinction in the reports between a percentage of change compared to a prior period versus the variable trended. Say for example you hear a city's murder rate is up 266% versus last year, at first glance it sounds like a war zone right?

That could be 3 in 2017 and 11 in 2018, so in this case the percentage of 266% over-emphasizes the change versus the underlying values.

This makes a provider starting from a lower prior period look better in YOY change when the totals are a different story. It it feels like data spin...
Absolutely, it can be spun to make themselves look fantastic.