• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →
Hmmmm, that's not possible. Our system can't produce a lead without the accompanying info. We specifically built it that way.

Give me a call and we can discuss. 314-701-6369.
Thank you for the phone conversation. Understanding how your tools work just cemented my opinion of InMarket Solutions as well as gave me a lens of understanding if we were to review other Direct Mail initiatives using your tools. Thanks again and we'll talk in Q3.
 
The winds of change is in the air...


View attachment 9896

View attachment 9895


@A Kappler You need an AI wiz kid, not a dev.
Yea I mostly agree with this. The future is going to be where ai experts level all the competition but the key will be also thoroughly understanding the problem statement in order to drive the value. 95% of businesses fail I think I heard somewhere. The same will probably also be true for ai companies and the gap will be subject matter expertise. If some kid dishes out some slop and claude tells him "great idea" it may sound good at face value, but will the market care? Probably not.
 

✨ AI Highlights

A dealer asks about building a custom car buying and trade-in data collection tool after finding existing solutions like ICO and TradePending unsuitable. The thread pivots into a real-world critique of Textium's platform when Dan Sayer shares poor trade-info capture rates from a direct mail campaign, ultimately traced to the agency (InMarket Solutions) rather than Textium's tech. The conversation closes with a nod toward AI expertise — not traditional developers — as the real competitive edge for building these kinds of tools.

Replies Views 24 3,094 Started Last Reply