• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

What do dealership websites make customers do that we’d never tolerate in the showroom?

I appreciate the response. In fact, it is my favorite thing I've ever read from you (y)

Maybe a different approach for the future is worth trying? Perhaps with fewer words.

Just to be clear, me challenging claims and reasoning you have a problem with?
  • Me: "I think the data says something different."
  • Me: "Here's why I interpret the customer journey differently."
  • Me: "How does this fit with the research?"
  • Me: "If AI can do X, why couldn't a dealer website do X?"
  • Me: "I think there's a missed opportunity here."
Those are arguments about the idea that I made, that I have a right to defend, however since you decided that was incorrect your have a problem with me defending myself?

Not one time did I go off topic or attack anyone....


However your sides only evidence was ""YOU said so" and when I pushed back your called names:
  1. "keyboard warrior"
  2. "our main troll of the day"
  3. "I don't know if you're like this in real life"
  4. "If you keep failing to listen..."
  5. "Your an AI"
Those are direct comments about me, have nothing to do with the post I posted and you guys responded to me asking questions by calling me names, you don't see a problem with that?

And while I am not an AI, what difference would it make?

I use AI daily to push back on my ideas, the ideas are not me, someone questioning my idea is not a personal attack on me.

AI can come up with unique was of doing things and thinking about things, in my humble opinion we've got a moment in time that we could group together and build something truly unique but to do that you have to be able to question the norm.

And the second someone does calling them names is probably not the best way to grow a forum or is that not what you want to do?
 
Last edited:
Just to be clear, me challenging claims and reasoning you have a problem with?
  • Me: "I think the data says something different."
  • Me: "Here's why I interpret the customer journey differently."
  • Me: "How does this fit with the research?"
  • Me: "If AI can do X, why couldn't a dealer website do X?"
  • Me: "I think there's a missed opportunity here."
Those are arguments about the idea that I made, that I have a right to defend you have a problem?

Not one time did I go off topic or attack anyone....


However your sides only evidence was ""YOU said so" and when I pushed back your called names:
  1. "keyboard warrior"
  2. "our main troll of the day"
  3. "I don't know if you're like this in real life"
  4. "If you keep failing to listen..."
  5. "Your an AI"
Those are direct comments about me, have nothing to do with the post I posted and you guys responded to me asking questions by calling me names, you don't see a problem with that?

:shakehd: Wow. Stuff like this puts you right back in troll status.

What you fail to see is the full history of your posts throughout DealerRefresh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The QR Code Guy
Just to be clear, me challenging claims and reasoning you have a problem with?
  • Me: "I think the data says something different."
  • Me: "Here's why I interpret the customer journey differently."
  • Me: "How does this fit with the research?"
  • Me: "If AI can do X, why couldn't a dealer website do X?"
  • Me: "I think there's a missed opportunity here."
Those are arguments about the idea that I made, that I have a right to defend, however since you decided that was incorrect your have a problem with me defending myself?

Not one time did I go off topic or attack anyone....


However your sides only evidence was ""YOU said so" and when I pushed back your called names:
  1. "keyboard warrior"
  2. "our main troll of the day"
  3. "I don't know if you're like this in real life"
  4. "If you keep failing to listen..."
  5. "Your an AI"
Those are direct comments about me, have nothing to do with the post I posted and you guys responded to me asking questions by calling me names, you don't see a problem with that?

And while I am not an AI, what difference would it make?

I use AI daily to push back on my ideas, the ideas are not me, someone questioning my idea is not a personal attack on me.

AI can come up with unique was of doing things and thinking about things, in my humble opinion we've got a moment in time that we could group together and build something truly unique but to do that you have to be able to question the norm.

And the second someone does calling them names is probably not the best way to grow a forum or is that not what you want to do?
giphy.gif
 
"All of them have taken a piece of the car-buying journey away from the dealership."

huh? :oops:

Without KAYAK, shopping for a flight and a car rental would SUCK. Does UNited Airlines think KAYAK is taking away the travel shopping journey from the air traveler?

Dude, stick to code, that's your domain.
A closer comparison would be hotels and OTAs like Booking.com. Hotels didn't lose their business, but they did lose the top of the funnel and now pay billions in commissions to rent their own customers back.

Before Cars.com/Autotrader, the dealership was the discovery layer. The customer's first meaningful interaction was with the dealer's own lot, own website, or own ad. Now, the discovery happens elsewhere, and the dealership pays to get that customer back as a lead.

My point isn't that third-party sites shouldn't exists, it's that dealership websites missed the boat on capturing intent early. When 70%+ of buyers start their journey somewhere else, whoever owns that discovery phase owns the customer. Right now, that's Google, Reddit, YouTube, and aggregators instead of the local dealership website.
 

Not all car shoppers think alike.​

1 of 4
View attachment 11611

2 of 4
View attachment 11612

3 of 4
View attachment 11613

4 of 4
View attachment 11614

Slide 3 is a secret weapon to see into the behaviors of shopping audience and this fires off creative, fresh, new merchandising experiences, all focused on the shoppers JTBD.
Joe, I think this is probably the part that makes the most sense to me.

We don’t treat every customer the same when they walk into the store.

Some show up with the stock number and basically want to know price, availability and how fast they can get it.

Others walk in and say I need something for three kids, I tow occasionally, or I need to stay around a certain payment. They’re still real buyers. They just need more help getting to the vehicle.

I think the website should be able to handle both without making either customer fight through a bunch of different tools.

If they know the car, get them there fast.

If they don’t, help them narrow it down.

The bigger thing for me is once they tell us something, don’t make them keep telling us again. That’s probably the part of the online experience I would fix first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vochi

✨ AI Highlights

A dealer prompts discussion about how dealership websites subject online shoppers to friction—repeated data requests, overlapping popups, and disjointed vendor tools—that would never be tolerated in a physical showroom. The thread quickly derails into a prolonged dispute between community members over tone, trolling accusations, and whether third-party sites like Cars.com have harmed or simply repositioned dealers, with the hotel/OTA commission analogy emerging as the most substantive counterpoint. The original poster's sharpest takeaway, echoed by joe.pistell's segmentation slides, is that dealers should tailor digital experiences to different shopper types rather than applying a one-size-fits-all lead-capture approach.

Replies Views 26 1,494 Started Last Reply