• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

New Reynolds and Reynolds process to prevent third party data collection.

Well here it is! We just received the Reynolds Data Authorization Agreement from our National Performance Manager at eLeadCRM and their invoice for $500 Setup/$216.30 Per Month. We haven't heard from our eLeadCRM Regional Performance Manager since July 5. But they sure got this out to us!

"The paper work in reference to R&R RCI is attached please fill it out and return. If you have any questions please give me a call at xxx-xxx-xxxx. Also the R&R video is below explaining what they are now doing."

Reynolds Certified Interface | Third Party Integration | RCI | Reynolds and Reynolds

I have six vendors in each store that polls data from Reynolds on a daily basis. If all the vendors pass along their RCI cost to the dealers, it will become a road block for small stores like ours (50-60 units). We will not be able to justify the expense for the data automation.

I'm glad we only have 1.5 years left with Reynolds. It's plenty of time to find their replacement!
 
I'm starting to hear these stories more and more. Vendors have little choice the to pass the cost to the dealership. This is some complete bs. I can't believe a company would take this type of approach in this day and age. I don't get it.
 

✨ AI Highlights

Reynolds and Reynolds has implemented an automated security process that disables user IDs suspected of third-party vendor access, with locked accounts showing an "AUTOMATED ACCESS ATTEMPTS" message and no admin unlock capability in the standard interface. Dealers and IT professionals report frustration over the policy's impact on legitimate internal automation (like ERA Access scheduler scripts) and Reynolds' apparent reluctance to unlock accounts unless vendors obtain RCI certification, with some suspecting the measure is designed to stifle competition rather than genuine security threats. A Reynolds representative (Dave Bates) eventually engaged with an affected user, suggesting the policy has legitimate justification, though community skepticism remained.

Replies Views 92 56,866 Started Last Reply