The technology is fundamentally the same, they perform millions of search terms, store the results and determine the sampled value. They also lower the ctr for all of us, so kind of toxic
Haha, at first I was like this is too complicated to think about #otherpriorities #attribution...hehe
The secondary part is what do I do with this information. To me that is where this effort is mute.
@Jon Berna this is a conversation I have all the time with dealers... WHAT IS THE VALUE?
All these reports..
WTF are you going to do with it?
What changes are you going to make to... "to make a difference in what you do?"
Change providers..
Changes pay structure..
Change employees..
Stop asking for all this irreverent BS reporting at the end of the month if it's not data you can FOR CHANGE.
You're a nerd @Jon Berna. That's a high praise complement. Reading through I do want to make sure that everyone knows that my numbers are Conversions from SRP to VDP click conversion, nothing further than that (no Conversion from VDP to customer action). The visual trigger of seeing the mirror set off my "hey now" reaction. Just curious if that trend, inverse trend that is mostly consistent, has anything to do with something that is measurable. Same inventory, same price, consistent vendor packages, same time period; just odd to me.Haha, at first I was like this is too complicated to think about #otherpriorities #attribution...hehe
Then I was like yeah but what's the actual correlation. If it was high aka negative correlation <-.60 it would be worth more of an inspection as we have a ton of this data.
Dan I give you credit for posing the question it's definitely a unique thought experiment. The secondary part is what do I do with this information. To me that is where this effort is mute. What these two companies do to drive traffic and move customers through the shopping process mater, however are they linked in a way that would create a mirror effect? Even if we knew what governs that it I dont think it's something that helps me find new value.
More of a street smart guy that got lucky a long time ago working for someone who mentored me in a new direction. But I'll take the complimentYou're a nerd @Jon Berna. That's a high praise complement. Reading through I do want to make sure that everyone knows that my numbers are Conversions from SRP to VDP click conversion, nothing further than that (no Conversion from VDP to customer action). The visual trigger of seeing the mirror set off my "hey now" reaction. Just curious if that trend, inverse trend that is mostly consistent, has anything to do with something that is measurable. Same inventory, same price, consistent vendor packages, same time period; just odd to me.
I used to just calculate SRP/VDP conversion as a single number over a period of time; QTR. Not sure why I mapped it out this time.The reason this came up was that I review our Classifieds performance; compared to each other (this whole conversation seems similar to a Refresh Friday a while back ). I run two at a time and so am reviewing performance against each other as well as others that I have recently added (AutoTrader and enhanced Edmunds at a couple locations). One of my measures is SRP to VDP conversion. I felt that gave me a view into which vendor gave my cars the best chance to convert to a VDP. I look at a number of other factors including leads/calls, referral conversion, multi-channel, cohort, etc. So, what will I do with the data @Jeff Kershner ? I don't friggin know but was wondering if anyone had a great answer to the inverse relationship that may discredit my weight on SRP/VDP conversion...