I'll DM you so we can talk further.
Not to pollute the thread, but... some others may find this topic an interesting aside.
I started using background removed images several years ago and had the same reservations. Would people think it's a stock photo?
So I did my best to make a convincing fake. I went out and shot a great background. I matched the angles between the background and the vehicle images so the photo would look real. (If I take the pictures at the right time of day so the shadows align, it's very hard to tell that the composited photo isn't real.)
But within the past year I noticed dealers were using background removed pictures quite a bit. Were consumers now savvy to the clipped images?
So I ran an A/B test... could I run a more branded, obviously background removed image vs my real looking fake?
View attachment 5703View attachment 5704
The CTR on the right was almost 2x the left. Granted, the reasons could be many -- maybe the right is just more visually appealing . But this test was enough for me to put the clipped photos back into realistic backdrops.
But I haven't run a real picture vs background removed picture A/B test because the formatting advantage is dispositive. The above are used in my open graph images, Craigslist, and eBay (landscape formats). But below is for Facebook's portrait orientation.
View attachment 5705
Given the ever changing landscape of photo dimensions and orientations, and the need to dynamically generate, I think background removed hero images should be dealership table stakes.