Websites, SEO, SEM, Display, Social, Marketing

Jeffrey Fisher, a former auto sales consultant with recent marketing education, requests anonymous feedback from forum members via a survey to help improve resources for auto dealers. No personal information is collected in the questionnaire, and he's seeking input from the DealerRefresh community to inform his work. The post is a straightforward request for participation in market research rather than a discussion with multiple replies or conclusions.

Elizabeth Apps questions whether dealers should rely on third-party lead providers or instead invest in their own SEO and PPC, and asks what metrics should be used to evaluate provider performance. Steve Stauning narrows the field to two legitimate providers (AutoWeb and TrueCar) and advocates for measuring success through connection rate and cost per sale, while Alexander Lau emphasizes that cost per sale and multi-touch attribution models are more valuable than simple cost-per-lead metrics for holding vendors accountable.

The thread presents an infographic arguing that while online research and transparency are critical to modern car buyers, personal human connection at the dealership is equally important. Customers typically arrive already informed about what they want, making the salesperson's role less about product education and more about building trust and rapport. The key insight is that dealers who foster genuine personal connections alongside digital transparency are better positioned to convert informed shoppers into buyers.

Ryan Gerardi and Chris Leslie host an hour-long podcast recapping industry gossip and diving into Eric Miltsch's 2018 automotive marketing predictions article on DealerRefresh. Key topics include how dealers will reshape the vehicle buying experience, the rise of subscription-based ownership models, and evolving vendor roles in the industry. The episode blends informal industry commentary with forward-looking analysis of trends expected to define auto retail in 2018.

Dealers are looking for a way to aggregate and display individual salesperson reviews across multiple platforms (Google, Facebook, DealerRater), similar to how dealership-wide reviews are compiled on website homepages. While several vendors offer partial solutions—including GrowthFx staff pages, SaySo video testimonials, and REPConnect VDP integration—no existing service fully aggregates reviews by employee across all platforms, primarily because Google and Facebook prohibit employee tagging and have restrictive APIs that complicate automation. The consensus is that DealerRater remains the most practical platform for this purpose due to its built-in employee tagging and easier data access, though developing a comprehensive cross-platform solution remains a viable but technically challenging business opportunity.

Rick Buffkin asks if there are any third-party websites besides Carfax or manufacturer sites that provide remaining warranty information on vehicles. The thread receives minimal substantive response, with Jeff Kershner confirming that Carfax and OEM sites are the primary resources available, while other replies are non-helpful or joking in nature. No alternative solutions are identified.

A dealer seeks advice on how to track traffic and measure ROI from third-party lead generation platforms, frustrated by difficulty connecting dots between digital channels and sales results. A respondent begins to address the question by noting that platform effectiveness varies by market demographics and that there's no one-size-fits-all solution, though best practices exist for different regions. The thread appears focused on identifying which lead gen platforms offer superior tracking and attribution capabilities rather than evaluating platform quality itself.

A dealership struggling to fill a lube tech position despite posting on multiple job boards for three months receives advice focused on shifting strategy from simply posting to marketing the opportunity as an attractive product—including developing a dedicated careers site that showcases company culture and benefits. The thread reveals that traditional job boards and increased spending rarely yield results; instead, success comes from building relationships with vocational schools, community colleges, and targeting candidates based on what they actually want in a job. The original poster's follow-up reveals a complicating factor: pending ownership transition and rural location are likely deterring applicants, suggesting she should maintain "business as usual" messaging until the transition is official.

The thread debates whether premium exact-match domains (EMDs) like usedcarsforsale.com are worth significant investment for car dealers, with opinions divided between those who see value in type-in direct traffic and those who believe most traffic now comes from Google search rather than direct navigation. The consensus leans toward prioritizing brand-focused domains and SEO over premium EMDs, though John B argues that affordable regional domains (like {city}auto.com) with existing type-in traffic can still deliver solid ROI when developed into functioning websites. The key insight is that while domain names have diminished in strategic importance since the early 2010s, finding affordable names with existing direct traffic remains a worthwhile tactic if pursued selectively rather than aggressively.

The thread explores compensation structures for in-house automotive dealership marketers, with contributors sharing their experiences and preferences. While one respondent advocates for percentage-of-gross compensation, the consensus favors a hybrid approach: a base salary to provide financial stability (since marketing is longer-term) paired with performance bonuses tied to dealership objectives like vehicle sales, service RO counts, or profitability targets. The key insight is that total compensation should scale with the marketer's demonstrated results and market value while ensuring they're not distracted by financial stress.

A Toyota and Nissan dealer in Central Florida seeks recommendations for a full-service marketing agency to handle traditional, digital, content, branding, website design, paid search, media buying, social, and direct marketing. Respondents recommend benchmarking multiple agencies including DealerCMO, Force Marketing, C4 Analytics, MSX, PCG, and Strong Automotive Agency, with Strong Automotive noted as particularly experienced with Toyota dealerships in the Florida region. The thread provides a curated list of vetted vendors without deep debate or analysis.

Daniel Mondello breaks down why dealers should bid on their own branded search terms despite strong SEO, explaining what it should realistically cost and how to audit your SEM vendor's campaigns to spot self-serving practices. The key insight is that many SEM vendors inflate branded search spend to boost their managed budget totals, and dealers can learn to inspect campaign structures to protect themselves. Practical guidance is offered for evaluating whether a vendor is working in the dealer's best interest or padding their own metrics.

Eric Miltsch kicks off 2018 with his annual automotive marketing predictions post, reflecting on shifts in consumer behavior, vendor solutions, and dealer complacency after six consecutive years of record new car sales. The thread explores where dealers and vendors are falling short and what changes are needed to maintain a competitive edge. The central insight is that prolonged success has bred stagnation, and those ignoring market signals risk being left behind as the industry evolves.

A dealer discovered a competitor using Nabthat, a lead-capture tool that promises "secret pricing," but found the experience broken: the initial CTA showed prices already advertised publicly, while a follow-up automated email quoted a price $2,000 higher. The thread evolved into a broader discussion about how dealers over-complicate their tech stacks by adopting "cool widgets" without proper implementation, integration, or resource allocation, ultimately creating poor customer experiences and contradicting their own pricing strategies.

Alexander Lau initiates a discussion about AdWords Extensions for automotive dealers, sharing an article that Ryan Everson critiques as outdated and incomplete regarding newer extension types like message, price, and promotion extensions. The conversation evolves to reveal that while most automotive agencies do use extensions, the real performance gains come from proper account segmentation, targeted keywords, and robust negative keyword lists rather than extension implementation alone. Ryan shares concrete metrics (14% CTR on 140K searches) demonstrating the impact of moving paid search in-house with better strategic optimization.

A dealer inquires about purchasing DMV lead lists of businesses that own specific vehicle makes/models to support their new commercial department's outbound calling efforts. Respondents confirm that such lists are available from third-party vendors, though one poster notes that while names, make/model/year, and addresses are typically obtainable, email and phone numbers usually are not included. The thread suggests this is a viable but imperfect lead generation strategy, with one vendor having experienced mixed results.

Greg Schafer asks if anyone has software that displays real-time wait times for Quick Lane services on dealer websites. The thread generates interest but receives limited responses, with only one actionable recommendation: paulray endorses workstiming.com as a solution that provides waiting room, web, and text updates on service progress and availability, though it requires proper setup and staff discipline to work effectively.

The thread discusses leveraging online sales tools during holiday closures, citing data showing that Christmas and Christmas Eve are peak times for used car purchases. The original post presents statistics from Drive Motors' CEO indicating significant spikes in online orders during mid-to-late December (with increases of 39-67%), suggesting dealers should enable online shopping and checkout functionality to capture sales when showrooms are closed. The thread appears incomplete, with a follow-up reply suggesting the original post may have been cut off.

Steve Stauning argues that dealerships are unknowingly funding their vendors' lavish perks — from NADA booths to personal touches like branded swag — through inflated pricing, drawing a parallel to how casino gamblers unknowingly pay for the Bellagio's opulence. The thread challenges dealers to scrutinize vendor overhead costs and question whether they're paying for results or for the vendor's image. The key insight is that a vendor's 'personal touch' and flashy presence are often signals of higher costs passed on to the dealer, not indicators of better performance.

DealerRater announced enhanced versions of its Connections product suite (Connections Plus and Connections Premier) designed to automate review generation and connect salespeople with ready-to-buy shoppers. One commenter expressed optimism about the new features, while another clarified confusion about the timeline—these enhanced products were newly released in December 2017, separate from the initial Connections launch at NADA earlier that year. The thread suggests dealer interest in automation tools that streamline the review and lead-connection process.

A dealer frustrated with Dealer.com's slow update processes and restricted customization options seeks alternative website providers, but learns that his specific limitations stem from FCA Canada program restrictions rather than Dealer.com's capabilities alone. After being denied access to Advanced Composer (which would allow him to modify code directly), the thread reveals that manufacturer programs often mandate certain access levels and design restrictions, meaning the real constraint isn't the vendor but the OEM agreement he's locked into.