Websites, SEO, SEM, Display, Social, Marketing

A dealer attempted to cancel their AutoTrader subscription by mailing a cancellation notice to the address listed in their agreement, only to have the letter returned as undeliverable—raising questions about whether AutoTrader makes cancellation deliberately difficult. The thread reveals frustration with AutoTrader's retention tactics and compares the experience to other notoriously hard-to-cancel services like AOL, with some posters suggesting the solution is to simply stop paying or contact a sales rep directly. The underlying sentiment is that dealers feel trapped in expensive contracts with poor ROI and limited recourse when they want out.

A dealership using a shared inventory program with other same-make dealers reports that their DealerDotCom website is incorrectly displaying competitor pricing on vehicles from partner dealers, when only inventory counts should be shared. Respondents identify this as a data configuration issue solvable through either separating inventory into different classes/folders, duplicating data with price filtering logic, or simple conditional programming to hide competitor prices based on dealer identifier—though whether the vendor will implement the fix remains uncertain.

• Poll

Dealers discuss benchmarking advertising spend per vehicle sold (PVR), with contributors sharing metrics ranging from $100-$150 for new vehicles to $435+ for used vehicles, while debating whether PVR is a useful planning and performance measurement tool versus focusing purely on ROI. Key insights include the difficulty of isolating advertising impact due to external variables (market conditions, inventory, competition, interest rates) and the 4-6 week lag time between advertising spend and measurable sales results, making month-to-month analysis unreliable without year-over-year trend analysis.

Kevin McKillop seeks help locating a published article comparing a dealership's performance across all-digital, all-traditional, and mixed marketing approaches, believing it may have appeared on a site like Wards Auto. The thread explores whether such comparative case study research exists within automotive industry publications. No clear resolution or conclusion is evident from the original post alone, as it's primarily a request for source material rather than a discussion of findings.

A dealer reported that AutoTrader's search results page (SRP) layout has changed dramatically—removing vehicle descriptions and shifting to a grid view optimized for tablets—prompting discussion about whether this is a widespread rollout or A/B testing. Responses revealed this is a beta test deployed to select geographic areas, with an option to switch back to list view, though opinions varied on whether the larger photos and description-free design benefits consumers or simply drives more clicks to vehicle detail pages (VDPs) at the expense of usability.

Dealers discussing inventory-driven SEM (dynamic inventory marketing) debate its effectiveness versus organic search and other traffic-driving methods. The consensus emphasizes that while inventory SEM campaigns can work, organic SEO typically delivers better ROI and conversion rates, and dealers should focus on conversion rate optimization and proper keyword strategy rather than simply increasing traffic volume. Key insight: doubling leads requires either significantly more traffic or improved conversion rates on vehicle listing pages—traffic increases alone won't solve the equation.

An internet director transitioning from car sales seeks advice on defining his role and justifying his position to dealership management, questioning whether he should be focused purely on lead generation or take on broader marketing responsibilities. Respondents highlight a key tension: most dealerships undervalue the internet director role, relegating it to CRM monitoring at entry-level pay, while successful practitioners distinguish themselves by building a business case around revenue growth and cost savings rather than direct sales. The consensus advice is to develop a comprehensive business plan demonstrating measurable value, position yourself as a strategic marketing asset rather than a tactical lead-watcher, and consider that larger multi-franchise groups may better compensate the broader marketing management role he aspires to.

JD Rucker presents a framework for understanding the three stages of a dealership's social media presence, arguing that no universal formula exists but that targeted strategies can drive real foot traffic and sales. A follow-up discussion clarifies why LinkedIn and Instagram are secondary priorities versus Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and Pinterest, with social signals and local engagement cited as key metrics. The thread is mostly supportive, with one substantive exchange about fan growth benchmarks and platform selection strategy.

The thread covers Yahoo!'s policy of releasing inactive email user IDs after 12 months, which poses a risk for auto dealers whose customer databases contain a high volume of Yahoo addresses. Dealers could end up emailing the wrong person if a previously valid address is reassigned to a new user. Commenters highlight that many consumers use Yahoo addresses as spam inboxes, raising additional questions about email list quality and deliverability.

A dealer questions CarGurus' sudden $5,200/month pricing quote, believing the site should be free or cost around $500/month, prompting discussion about whether the investment is worthwhile. Responses reveal that CarGurus sources inventory through third-party feeds (like Cars.com) that rotate listings unpredictably, and dealers can pay for a direct account to receive leads consistently and control their presence. The key insight is that while CarGurus attracts customer traffic and can generate leads, the platform's value depends on whether dealers want to pay for guaranteed visibility or accept the uncertainty of free feed-based listings.

Dealers debate the effectiveness of third-party lead providers (Autobytel, Dealix, AutoUSA, TrueCar, CarWoo) for generating new and used car leads, with mixed results depending on market, lead follow-up procedures, and geographic radius settings. The consensus suggests that while some dealers have success with specific vendors like Autobytel, investing in organic search optimization and paid search should be prioritized, and that lead quality and ROI vary significantly by location and dealer execution. One experienced voice cautions against TrueCar's $300-per-sale model and advocates strongly for owning organic search instead of relying on third-party lead generators.

A dealer asks whether GM's third-party lead program offers flexibility to adjust volume, geographic radius, or lead types, and receives confirmation that no customization is available. However, the respondent reports strong ROI from these leads if dealers contact prospects immediately (before competitors, as GM distributes each lead to ~5 dealers) and implement proper 60- and 90-day follow-up processes to capture delayed buyers.

Craigslist has disabled HTML IMG tags in postings, forcing dealers to use the platform's native image upload feature instead of external image hosting services. While the change creates friction for high-volume posters, participants see it as potentially beneficial for legitimate dealers—leveling the playing field against automated spam systems and rewarding those willing to follow proper posting procedures, though it raises questions about overall lead volume impact.

Dealers report that Cars.com is sending follow-up emails to leads that feature competing dealers' inventory rather than highlighting the original vehicle, and separately discovered that Cars.com is distributing dealer inventory to TrueCar without explicit dealer permission. Cars.com acknowledged the email campaign is intentional strategy to re-engage shoppers, but dealers are concerned about the lack of transparency and potential copyright/content issues with inventory data being shared across platforms.

• Poll

Automotive dealers debate whether to invest limited marketing resources in SEO (website optimization and blogging) or social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter), with most participants ultimately favoring SEO. The consensus reasoning is that SEO targets high-intent car buyers actively searching for vehicles, requires less ongoing maintenance than social media, and avoids competing against non-commercial content, whereas social media's organic reach is limited and dealerships struggle to build authentic engagement since customers view them skeptically.

Google rolled out a major algorithm update in late June that significantly impacted automotive search results, particularly penalizing exact-match and partial-match domains while elevating brand signals and social signals. Early analysis from Moz indicated this was a substantial change affecting first-page rankings across the industry. Early reports from dealers showed mixed impacts—some sites experienced notable ranking losses (like one store losing rank for "Ontario Toyota") while others saw minimal fluctuation so far.

JD Rucker opens a discussion arguing that after years of hype and confusion, social media's actual role in automotive retail is finally becoming clearer, with Facebook and other platforms helping dealers better understand what the medium can realistically deliver. The post teases a multi-part series on car-selling strategies emerging from social media, prompting enthusiastic responses from dealers and industry peers eager to learn which tactics drive traffic, leads, and showroom visits rather than just fan counts. The thread doesn't yet deliver the full insight but signals growing demand for practical, measurement-focused social media guidance over vanity metrics.

Dave Erickson reports that Facebook recommendations have disappeared from dealer Facebook pages on desktop/web browsers, though they remain visible on iPhone mobile apps. He notes the issue appears to affect multiple dealership Facebook pages, suggesting a potential platform-wide change rather than an isolated problem. The thread seeks information on whether this is a known Facebook feature change or technical issue.

Two dealers share their frustration with Nissan's third-party lead quality, reporting high costs ($23.50 per lead), poor phone/email contact rates, and low conversion from credit-challenged prospects, prompting both to cancel the service. One dealer also discontinued AutoTrader due to minimal leads over seven months, retaining only a grandfathered Cars.com account that costs substantially less. The consensus suggests that third-party lead quality varies significantly by source, and success depends on both lead quality and dealer execution (photos, descriptions, pricing).

The thread shares a SlideShare presentation by Lindsey Kirchoff exploring why Millennials are delaying or skipping car purchases, sparked by a community member seeking Gen Y research. The standout stat — that 46% of 18-24 year olds would choose the internet over their car — drives discussion about whether this is a lasting generational shift or a phase that fades with age, marriage, and kids. Commenters from inside and outside the demographic weigh in on contributing factors like the decline of Driver's Ed and the internet's role in making car ownership feel less essential.

Dealers compare three automotive chat solutions—ActivEngage, ContactAtOnce, and CarChat24—sharing their hands-on experiences with each platform's features, pricing, and customer support. ContactAtOnce emerges as the consensus preference among dealers for its cost-effectiveness, ease of use, customization options, and exceptional support, with one dealer reporting a 19% chat close rate; meanwhile, ActivEngage is praised for reporting capabilities but criticized for Windows-only availability and limited interface customization. CarChat24 receives positive feedback for its managed chat service and advanced backend analytics, though fewer dealers in this thread have direct experience with it.

A WardsAuto study reveals that Cars.com (61%) and Edmunds (54%) are the most popular dealer review sites, with significant generational differences in platform preferences. The thread discussion centers on why dealer reviews don't carry as much weight in purchasing decisions as they do in other industries like restaurants, with participants concluding that factors like price, location, and vehicle selection often override reputation concerns, particularly for new vehicle purchases.