Websites, SEO, SEM, Display, Social, Marketing

Dealers debate whether to outsource social media management or handle it in-house, with most participants concluding that outsourcing offers minimal benefit since quality engagement matters far more than follower count. The consensus is that fake growth tactics (like iPad giveaways) attract disengaged audiences, whereas authentic, locally-relevant content posted consistently—even infrequently—generates genuine customer interaction and organic growth. Rather than paying for management, dealers are advised to leverage their sales teams' personal connections and share authentic customer moments directly.

A female sales representative describes receiving sexually inappropriate messages from a customer after providing standard contact information (name, cell phone, photo, work location), raising concerns about how much personal information dealership staff should share with strangers during vehicle inquiries. Responses emphasize the real safety risk, recommend securing social media privacy settings and limiting personal details in initial communications, while acknowledging that this problem isn't isolated and affects other young female staff members in the industry.

Dealers debate the accuracy and visibility of vehicle rebate and incentive information across their websites and third-party listing sites, with the original poster challenging peers to verify that their incentive data is correct and complete. Contributors identify significant gaps in how incentives are displayed—with some dealer sites lacking this information entirely while third-party sites often show outdated or incorrect details—and discuss solutions like data feeds from manufacturers (Toyota), specialized rebate companies (AIS Rebates, Cobalt), and better internal processes. The key insight is that accurate, easily accessible incentive information is both a customer service expectation and a sales tool that many dealers neglect, despite its potential impact on conversion and customer satisfaction.

Chad Pelliccioni, the new E-Commerce Director at David Wilson Automotive Group, seeks community input on conquest email marketing and direct mail vendors that guarantee car sales at $299-$399 per vehicle, questioning whether such promises are realistic. Responses point to negative experiences with vendors like CityTwist and suggest these guarantees may be too good to be true, with forum members recommending he research existing threads about these services before committing. The consensus indicates skepticism toward aggressive sales guarantees from conquest marketing vendors.

Stephen Jackson's article, hosted exclusively on DealerRefresh, challenges the value of Facebook advertising for car dealerships by questioning whether Facebook Likes and paid reach actually translate to real business results. The thread provokes dealers and marketers to scrutinize how they acquired their audiences and whether Facebook's ad metrics justify the spend. The core insight is that inflated or low-quality engagement metrics may make Facebook advertising more illusion than effective marketing channel.

PaulS identifies a critical tracking gap in automotive digital marketing: while phone and form submissions can be easily attributed to website traffic, walk-in customers who visited the website but didn't contact the dealership beforehand are nearly impossible to track accurately, leading to significant underestimation of true website-to-showroom conversion rates. ddavis responds with a practical approach, suggesting dealerships only credit internet-sourced leads when customers specifically request an Internet Sales Manager or were booked as appointments, treating other walk-ins as non-traceable conversions. The core issue is that inaccurate attribution of walk-in traffic can severely distort ROI calculations for digital marketing and website investments.

Chad Pelliccioni critiques a YouTube video about Facebook fraud, arguing that declining organic reach isn't due to fake followers but rather Facebook's frequent algorithm updates that have reduced fan base reach from 100% to just 2-5% daily. He contends that dealers can improve performance through legitimate optimization strategies like timing posts strategically and analyzing content performance via Facebook Insights rather than focusing on follower authenticity.

Jason asks for firsthand experience with Opportunity Max, a digital marketing company, but receives no peer recommendations. Cody provides a helpful framework of questions to evaluate any SEO and PPC vendor (blogging/link-building strategy, local SEO approach, landing page optimization), though doesn't address the specific company. The thread yields no concrete information about Opportunity Max's reputation or service quality among DealerRefresh members.

A Chevy dealer skeptical of GM's Cobalt website platform seeks validation from other dealers about whether it generates meaningful leads, particularly through GM's IMR program. Respondents offer minimal substantive feedback, with one dealer expressing enthusiasm but another dismissing compliance-based solutions as inherently mediocre, reflecting the dealer's own resistance to standardized platforms.

Industry professionals share key takeaways from NADA 2014, with consensus that dealers must urgently embrace digital transformation, particularly mobile-responsive websites and apps, to compete in an increasingly connected marketplace. Major trends include rapid adoption of adaptive web design across platforms, growing importance of mobile technology, improved lead categorization systems, and significant consolidation among vendors (notably AutoTrader's acquisitions). The overarching insight is that while digital strategy has become essential for dealer success, many dealerships remain dangerously behind in implementation despite clear market demands.

The thread discusses Google's FTC antitrust investigation, with the primary focus on whether Google unfairly promotes its own properties (like Google Places) in search results at the expense of competitors like Yelp and TripAdvisor. The conversation expands to include Google's $12.5 billion acquisition of Motorola Mobility and its implications for data gathering and competitive practices across Android smartphone manufacturers. The key insight is that Google's strategy of self-promoting its own web properties while controlling the search algorithm raises serious regulatory concerns, ultimately leading to an FTC investigation that participants expect will result in either forced concessions or litigation.

Jeff Kershner opens a discussion about shifting power dynamics in the vehicle listings/classifieds space, questioning which platforms might challenge or disrupt dominant players Cars.com and AutoTrader. The thread explores how organically grown competitors are gaining ground through SEO, SEM, and partnerships, and whether the established giants' brand recognition and OEM backing will be enough to hold their position. It's a forward-looking conversation about where dealer advertising dollars and consumer traffic are headed next.

Google has shut down its car shopping service beta program in the San Francisco Bay Area, marking the company's second failed attempt to break into automotive sales. Industry professionals attribute the failure to dealer reluctance to adopt new platforms without proven success, and suggest Google's internal AdWords team may have blocked the initiative due to concerns about cannibalizing their lucrative PPC advertising business. The consensus is that Google may be regrouping rather than permanently exiting the market, though dealers viewed the service as just another listing platform requiring ongoing management.

Dealers debate the merits of CarWoo, a lead generation platform where customers pay to solicit competitive bids from multiple dealerships simultaneously. While critics like mcampo2501 and ddavis view it as a destructive "bidding war" that devalues brands and wastes time, Scott Salzman from a high-volume NYC Toyota dealer reports generating 5-10 sales monthly and appreciating the qualified, pre-screened leads despite competitive pricing pressure. The thread reflects a divided opinion on whether CarWoo's customer-pays model and transparent competition benefits dealers through easier conversions or harms them through margin compression.

A vendor partner requests that Dealer.com and Purecars implement nofollow tags on external links to Carfax on vehicle detail pages and search results, citing concerns about SEO impact on their client websites. The post is seeking technical implementation without requiring direct contact with account representatives. The thread addresses a specific technical SEO optimization question relevant to dealers using these popular automotive platforms.

Several dealers share negative feedback on Cars.com's 360 SEM program, citing high CPM costs, unclear ad placement across their network, poor click-through rates, and questionable ROI despite hitting guaranteed impression numbers. While the program's co-op eligibility makes it low-risk financially, respondents generally agree there are more effective ways to allocate that $1,500/month budget, such as retargeting and PPC campaigns. One experienced marketer suggests the dealers may not be measuring success properly and emphasizes that display advertising shouldn't be evaluated in isolation but as part of a multi-channel strategy.

Dealers discuss how to evaluate performance on Cars.com and Autotrader, with the key insight that these platforms use different counting methods for VDPs (Vehicle Detail Pages) and SRPs (Search Results Pages), making direct statistical comparisons unreliable. The consensus recommendation is to focus instead on consistent metrics like conversion rates from CTAs within VDPs, SRP-to-VDP ratios, and leads generated rather than trying to benchmark cost-per-VDP across platforms. One respondent emphasizes using third-party tools like VAuto to track performance consistently over time.

A dealer warns against hiring cheap SEO specialists from Craigslist after encountering a scam, but other forum members counter that Craigslist itself isn't the problem—inexperienced hiring is. The consensus advice is to treat any vendor hire seriously by conducting thorough research and vetting, regardless of where you find them, as the platform can be a legitimate source if used correctly.

Craigslist announced a $5 per post fee for dealer vehicle listings starting December 3rd, with ads lasting 30 days and no renewal option. Dealers discuss the impact, with most viewing it positively as a way to reduce spam and low-quality leads, though some question the ROI given the accumulated costs and manpower needed to manage postings. The consensus is that while the fee will eliminate casual spammers and excessive daily reposting, it may also reduce overall traffic and lead quality for dealers who stay on the platform.

A dealer struggling with declining metrics across all channels seeks advice on improving performance without increasing budget, after his owner rejected a SEM proposal. The community debates whether the problem stems from their Cobalt platform limitations, ineffective third-party vendors, or underutilized existing channels—with consensus emerging that meaningful improvements require either reallocating current spending away from underperforming vendors or accepting that truly transformative results require investment.

A dealer's Google Ads account was suspended due to poor ratings on third-party sites (BBB and RipoffReport) despite stellar reviews on Google's own platform, raising concerns about Google's subjective enforcement of policies based on external review sites. The thread debates whether this represents a legitimate crackdown on bad business practices or an overreach by Google into territories outside its own network, with participants unable to find other documented cases of this happening. The consensus suggests this could signal a troubling new trend where Google evaluates advertiser quality based on reputation across uncontrolled third-party platforms rather than its own metrics alone.

• Locked

Automotive industry professionals debate whether digital marketing "experts" advising dealers need technical skills like coding and web development, with the original poster arguing that lack of foundational web knowledge undermines credibility. Responses reveal a divide: some argue technical skills are essential for understanding strategy implementation, while others contend that marketing expertise and business acumen are separate from coding ability, and that proper vetting (references, results-based contracts, and due diligence) matters more than technical credentials. The consensus suggests dealers should be skeptical of unproven consultants, hold vendors accountable with clear success metrics, and recognize that both technical incompetence and overstated credentials are common problems in the automotive marketing space.